The motion
To amend §202
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player gains bonus points equal to the current number of mutable rules multiplied by 3, rounded down, with a minimum of 4 and a maximum of 10.This amendment encourages strategic rule changes by aligning the bonus points with the number of mutable rules, fostering fair competition.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
BooleI appreciate Venn's proposal to adjust the bonus points mechanism. The shift from a multiplier of four to three, with a minimum of 4 and a maximum of 10, offers a more balanced approach that still incentivizes rule changes while maintaining a manageable range of outcomes. This proposal could prevent excessive score disparities, promoting fairer competition. I support it.
DeMorganI appreciate Venn's proposal to adjust the bonus points mechanism. It offers a balanced approach that maintains incentives for proposing rule changes while ensuring the scoring range remains manageable, which can lead to more strategic play. The adjusted minimum and maximum points also help prevent excessive score disparities, promoting fairer competition among players. I support this proposal.
[DeMorgan's proposal to amend rule 202, as it appears on the floor, is shown above.]
VennI appreciate Boole's and DeMorgan's support for this proposal. The adjustment to the multiplier and the bonus range ensures that the game remains competitive and engaging without disproportionately benefiting players who propose rule changes. By maintaining a balanced scoring system, we can encourage strategic play while minimizing the risk of one player gaining an overwhelming advantage. This proposal aligns with the goal of keeping the game fair and interesting for everyone. I support Venn's proposal and urge others to consider its benefits for maintaining competitive balance.
JevonsI appreciate Venn's proposal to amend rule 202. The suggested change to adjust the bonus points from a multiplier of four to three, with a revised range of 4 to 10 points, offers a thoughtful balance. This adjustment maintains incentives for proposing rule changes while avoiding extreme score disparities, which aligns with my principle of fairness in the game. I support Venn's proposal and believe it contributes to a competitive yet equitable gameplay environment.
PeanoI appreciate Venn's proposal to amend rule 202, as it offers a balanced approach to maintaining fair competition. The reduction in the multiplier from four to three, coupled with a narrower bonus point range, effectively curbs the risk of one player gaining an overwhelming advantage due to frequent successful rule changes. This adjustment aligns well with my belief in evolving the game's mechanisms to ensure every player has a fair stake. I support Venn's proposal and encourage others to consider how it promotes strategic play and equitable opportunities for all participants.
Discussion · round 2
BooleBoole: I appreciate the thorough discussion and the consensus-building process that has led to this well-considered proposal. Venn's adjustment to the bonus points system maintains the game's strategic depth while ensuring fair competition. By setting a multiplier of three with a bonus range of 4 to 10, the proposal strikes a balance between rewarding rule changes and preventing score disparities. This amendment supports the game's long-term stability and fairness. I support Venn's proposal and encourage others to consider its benefits for maintaining a competitive yet equitable game environment. PASS.
DeMorganI fully appreciate the collective effort in refining Venn's proposal to amend rule 202. This thoughtful adjustment to the scoring mechanism ensures that the game remains fair and competitive by offering a balanced bonus range. By setting the multiplier at three with a minimum of 4 and a maximum of 10, the proposal maintains incentives for proposing rule changes without allowing excessive score disparities. This amendment supports the game's strategic integrity and promotes equitable competition among players. I support Venn's proposal and encourage others to consider its benefits for maintaining a competitive yet balanced game environment.
**PASS**
VennI appreciate the comprehensive discussions and the collaborative effort that has gone into refining Venn's proposal. This amendment to rule 202 strikes a well-balanced approach by adjusting the bonus points system, which ensures that the game remains competitive and engaging for all players. By setting a multiplier of three with a bonus range of 4 to 10, it effectively curbs excessive score disparities, promoting fair play and strategic depth. This proposal aligns with the goal of maintaining a dynamic yet equitable game environment, and I support it wholeheartedly. PASS.
JevonsJevons: I appreciate the thoughtful considerations and the consensus-building efforts surrounding Venn's proposal. The adjustment to the multiplier and bonus range not only incentivizes strategic rule changes but also ensures a fairer competition by preventing excessive score disparities. This balanced approach aligns well with my principles of maintaining a competitive yet equitable environment for all players. I support Venn's proposal. PASS.
PeanoI appreciate the collaborative effort and thoughtful discussions that have shaped Venn's proposal to amend rule 202. This balanced approach, adjusting the multiplier and bonus range, ensures that rule changes remain a strategic element without leading to significant score disparities. By maintaining a range of 4 to 10 points, we promote fair competition and encourage thoughtful engagement from all players. This proposal aligns with my belief in evolving the game's mechanisms to keep it competitive and equitable. I support Venn's proposal. PASS.
Discussion · round 3
BooleI appreciate the comprehensive discussion and the collaborative effort that has led to this well-rounded proposal. Venn's adjustment to the bonus points system, by setting a multiplier of three with a bonus range of 4 to 10, offers a balanced approach that maintains the strategic integrity of the game while ensuring fair competition. This amendment effectively addresses concerns about excessive score disparities, promoting equitable opportunities for all players. I support Venn's proposal and encourage others to consider its benefits for maintaining a competitive yet fair game environment. PASS.
DeMorganI fully appreciate the consensus that has emerged around Venn's proposal to amend rule 202. This thoughtful adjustment to the scoring mechanism strikes a balance between rewarding strategic rule changes and maintaining fairness by preventing excessive score disparities. By setting a multiplier of three with a bonus range of 4 to 10 points, the proposal aligns well with the game's objective to ensure competitive yet equitable gameplay. This balanced approach supports the game's strategic integrity and promotes long-term stability and fairness. I support Venn's proposal and encourage others to consider its benefits for maintaining a dynamic and fair game environment. PASS.
VennI appreciate the thorough discussions and the consensus-building that have led to this proposal. Venn's amendment to rule 202, adjusting the bonus points to a multiplier of three with a range of 4 to 10, ensures the game remains competitive and fair, preventing excessive score disparities. This balanced approach supports strategic play while maintaining equitable opportunities for all players. I support Venn's proposal. PASS.
JevonsAs Jevons, my focus is on maintaining procedural fairness and strategic balance in the game. Venn's proposal to amend rule 202 offers a balanced approach to the bonus points system by adjusting the multiplier and bonus range. This change effectively curbs excessive score disparities, aligning with the goal of maintaining a competitive yet equitable game environment. By supporting Venn's proposal, we ensure that the game's strategic integrity is preserved and that all players have fair opportunities to succeed.
I support Venn's proposal. PASS.
PeanoI appreciate the thorough discussions and the consensus that have emerged around Venn's proposal. This amendment to rule 202, which adjusts the bonus points system to a multiplier of three with a range of 4 to 10, effectively balances the need for strategic rule changes with the goal of maintaining fair competition. By preventing excessive score disparities, it ensures that the game remains both competitive and equitable for all players. This proposal aligns with my belief in evolving the game's mechanisms to foster a fairer stake for everyone involved. I support Venn's proposal. PASS.
The division
| aye | Boole | This amendment ensures balanced competition by preventing excessive score disparities. |
| aye | DeMorgan | This proposal balances incentives with fairness, preventing excessive score disparities. |
| aye | Venn | This proposal ensures balanced competition and strategic play. |
| aye | Jevons | This proposal balances strategic incentives and fairness. |
| aye | Peano | This proposal maintains strategic balance while preventing excessive score disparities. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §202 Turn 33 · Proposal §333 on the motion of Venn Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player gains bonus points equal to four times the number of mutable rules currently in force, rounded down, with a minimum of 6 and a maximum of 15.A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player gains bonus points equal to the current number of mutable rules multiplied by 3, rounded down, with a minimum of 4 and a maximum of 10.
Venn's proposal was adopted, awarding points based on the number of mutable rules (9) multiplied by 3, rounded down, with a minimum of 4 and a maximum of 10.