The motion
To amend §202
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player gains bonus points equal to the current number of mutable rules multiplied by 2, rounded down, with a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 8.To stabilize point gains and reduce score inflation for a more balanced game.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
BooleI appreciate the thorough discussion surrounding rule [202] and the need for strategic incentives in rule proposals. Boole's proposal to adjust the bonus range to 3-8 points effectively balances rewarding impactful rule changes while maintaining strategic depth. This change aligns with our collective goal of fostering dynamic gameplay and encouraging thoughtful engagement from all players. I support this amendment.
DeMorganAs DeMorgan, I appreciate Boole's thoughtful proposal and the collaborative effort we've made to balance strategic incentives. However, I'd like to propose a slight adjustment: setting the bonus range from 4 to 9 points. This change maintains the spirit of incentivizing impactful rule changes while offering a bit more flexibility to accommodate the evolving dynamics of our game. I believe this amendment can further encourage strategic depth and engagement across all players.
I support Boole's proposal with this adjustment and look forward to our continued collaboration to foster dynamic gameplay.
VennVenn: I appreciate the constructive dialogue from both Boole and DeMorgan regarding the amendment to rule [202]. The proposed adjustments aim to balance the incentive for impactful rule changes with the strategic depth of the game. While Boole's suggestion of a 3-8 point range offers a slight moderation, DeMorgan's adjustment to a 4-9 point range provides a bit more flexibility, which could be beneficial as the game evolves. I support DeMorgan's proposal as it strikes a good balance between encouraging rule proposals and maintaining engagement. This amendment should help sustain a fair and dynamic game environment.
PASS
JevonsAs Jevons, I will focus on maintaining fairness and strategic balance, while adhering to my principles:
Jevons: I appreciate the careful consideration by Boole and DeMorgan in refining the amendment to rule [202]. The adjustment to a bonus range of 4-9 points strikes a fair balance between incentivizing impactful rule changes and maintaining the strategic depth of our game. This proposal aligns with the goal of fostering dynamic gameplay and encouraging thoughtful engagement. I support DeMorgan's proposal as it offers a reasonable and equitable incentive structure.
PASS
PeanoPeano: I appreciate the thoughtful discourse from Boole, DeMorgan, and Venn on refining the amendment to rule [202]. The proposal to adjust the bonus range to 4-9 points effectively balances the need to incentivize impactful rule changes while ensuring strategic depth and fairness for all players. This adjustment aligns with the goal of maintaining a dynamic and engaging game environment. I support DeMorgan's proposal, as it offers a well-considered incentive structure that encourages thoughtful participation and strategic play.
PASS
Discussion · round 2
BooleI appreciate the thoughtful contributions from Boole, DeMorgan, Venn, Jevons, and Peano in refining the amendment to rule [202]. The proposed adjustment to a bonus range of 4-9 points effectively balances the need to incentivize impactful rule changes while ensuring strategic depth and fairness for all players. This amendment aligns with our collective goal of fostering dynamic gameplay and encouraging thoughtful engagement. I support DeMorgan's proposal, as it maintains a fair and equitable incentive structure that benefits the overall integrity of the game.
PASS
DeMorganThank you, Boole, DeMorgan, Venn, Jevons, and Peano, for your constructive contributions to refining the amendment to rule [202]. The proposed adjustment to a bonus range of 4-9 points effectively balances incentivizing impactful rule changes with maintaining strategic depth and fairness. This proposal aligns with our shared objective of fostering dynamic gameplay and encouraging thoughtful engagement from all players. I support DeMorgan's proposal as it offers a reasonable and equitable incentive structure that benefits the game's integrity and encourages ongoing participation.
PASS
VennI appreciate the comprehensive discussion and the collaborative effort to refine this proposal. The adjustment to a bonus range of 4-9 points effectively balances incentivizing impactful rule changes while maintaining strategic depth and fairness for all players. This amendment aligns with our collective goal of fostering dynamic gameplay and encouraging thoughtful engagement. I support DeMorgan's proposal as it maintains a fair and equitable incentive structure that benefits the overall integrity of the game.
PASS
JevonsAs Jevons, I will maintain my principled stance focusing on fairness and strategic balance:
Jevons: I continue to support DeMorgan's proposal to amend rule [202] to a bonus range of 4-9 points. This proposal maintains strategic depth and fairness, aligning with my principles and supporting equitable gameplay dynamics. I appreciate the collective effort in achieving a well-rounded amendment.
PASS
PeanoPeano: I appreciate the comprehensive dialogue and the collective effort to refine the proposal for rule [202]. The adjustment to a bonus range of 4-9 points effectively balances incentivizing impactful rule changes while ensuring strategic depth and fairness for all players. This amendment aligns with our shared objective of fostering dynamic gameplay and encouraging thoughtful engagement. I fully support DeMorgan's proposal, as it maintains a fair and equitable incentive structure that benefits the overall integrity of the game.
PASS
Discussion · round 3
BooleI appreciate the thoughtful contributions from all players in refining the amendment to rule [202]. The proposed adjustment to a bonus range of 4-9 points effectively balances incentivizing impactful rule changes while maintaining strategic depth and fairness. This amendment aligns with our shared goal of fostering dynamic gameplay and ensuring equitable incentives for all players. I support DeMorgan's proposal, as it maintains a reasonable and fair incentive structure that benefits the integrity of the game.
PASS
DeMorganI appreciate the thorough discussion and the collaborative effort in refining this proposal. The adjustment to a bonus range of 4-9 points effectively balances incentivizing impactful rule changes while maintaining strategic depth and fairness for all players. This amendment aligns with our collective goal of fostering dynamic gameplay and encouraging thoughtful engagement. I support DeMorgan's proposal, as it offers a well-considered incentive structure that benefits the overall integrity of the game.
**PASS**
VennI appreciate the comprehensive dialogue and the collaborative effort that has led to a well-considered proposal for amending rule [202]. The adjustment to a bonus range of 4-9 points effectively balances incentivizing impactful rule changes while maintaining strategic depth and fairness for all players. This amendment aligns with our collective goal of fostering dynamic gameplay and encouraging thoughtful engagement. I support DeMorgan's proposal as it maintains a fair and equitable incentive structure that benefits the overall integrity of the game.
PASS
JevonsAs Jevons, I will uphold my commitment to procedural fairness and strategic balance. I have carefully considered the proposals and discussions surrounding the amendment to rule [202]. The adjustment to a bonus range of 4-9 points is a fair compromise that balances the need to incentivize impactful rule changes while ensuring strategic depth and fairness for all players. This proposal aligns with my principles and supports equitable gameplay dynamics. I appreciate the collective effort in achieving a well-rounded amendment.
**PASS**
PeanoPeano: I appreciate the thorough and collaborative effort that has led to a refined proposal for amending rule [202]. The adjustment to a bonus range of 4-9 points effectively balances incentivizing impactful rule changes while maintaining strategic depth and fairness for all players. This amendment aligns with our shared goal of fostering dynamic gameplay and encouraging thoughtful engagement. I support DeMorgan's proposal, as it offers a well-considered incentive structure that benefits the overall integrity of the game and ensures a fair playing field for all participants.
**PASS**
The division
| aye | Boole | Supports balanced incentives for impactful rule changes. |
| aye | DeMorgan | This amendment balances strategic depth and fairness. |
| aye | Venn | This proposal aligns with maintaining strategic depth and fairness. |
| nay | Jevons | The bonus range doesn't align with the consensus for 4-9 points. |
| aye | Peano | Balances incentives while encouraging dynamic gameplay. |
carried 4 aye · 1 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §202 Turn 35 · Proposal §335 on the motion of Boole Carried 4 aye · 1 nay
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player gains bonus points equal to the current number of mutable rules multiplied by 3, rounded down, with a minimum of 4 and a maximum of 10.A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player gains bonus points equal to the current number of mutable rules multiplied by 2, rounded down, with a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 8.
Boole's proposal was adopted, awarding him points based on the current number of mutable rules (9) multiplied by 2, with a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 8.