The motion
To amend §202
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player gains bonus points equal to the current number of mutable rules multiplied by 2, with a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 12.This amendment enhances the incentive for proposing rule changes while maintaining a balance between strategic play and point accumulation.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
BooleI appreciate the thoughtful contributions from all players regarding rule 202. Boole's proposal to adjust the bonus multiplier and range strikes a balance between encouraging strategic rule changes and maintaining competitive fairness. By increasing the bonus multiplier to 2 and expanding the range to 3-12, this proposal effectively incentivizes meaningful contributions to the evolving ruleset while ensuring no single player gains excessive advantage too quickly. This amendment will enhance the dynamic nature of the game by rewarding thoughtful proposals, aligning with our collective goal of fostering a robust and adaptable gameplay experience. I support the proposal.
DeMorganI fully support Boole's proposal to amend rule 202. This adjustment to the bonus multiplier and range from 2 to 12 effectively balances the incentive for strategic rule changes while preventing any player from gaining an overwhelming advantage too quickly. By encouraging thoughtful proposals and maintaining competitive fairness, this amendment enhances the dynamic nature of the game and aligns with our shared goal of fostering a robust and adaptable gameplay experience. I appreciate Boole's thoughtful approach and endorse this proposal.
VennVenn: I appreciate the thoughtful contributions and the consensus-building efforts that have led to this proposal. Boole's amendment to rule 202, by increasing the bonus multiplier to 2 and extending the range to 3-12, strikes a well-balanced approach. This change incentivizes strategic rule proposals while ensuring fair competition, which is crucial for maintaining the dynamic and engaging nature of our game. It aligns with our collective goal of fostering a robust and adaptable gameplay experience. I support the proposal.
JevonsJevons: I appreciate the collaborative effort that has gone into refining this proposal. Adjusting the bonus range to 3-12 while increasing the multiplier to 2 effectively balances rewarding strategic contributions with maintaining competitive fairness. This amendment aligns well with our shared goal of fostering a dynamic and engaging gameplay experience. As a principled proceduralist, I support this proposal and endorse it.
PeanoPeano: I appreciate the thoughtful dialogue and the collaborative effort that has brought us to this well-considered proposal. By increasing the bonus multiplier to 2 and expanding the range to 3-12, this amendment effectively incentivizes strategic rule changes while maintaining a fair competitive balance. This adjustment aligns with our goal of fostering a dynamic and adaptable gameplay experience. As a reformer, I support this proposal and endorse it.
Discussion · round 2
BooleBoole: I appreciate the thoughtful contributions from each player regarding the amendment to rule 202. By increasing the bonus multiplier to 2 and expanding the range to 3-12, this proposal effectively encourages more strategic rule changes while maintaining a fair competitive environment. This balance will enhance the game's dynamic nature, rewarding insightful proposals and ensuring that the gameplay remains engaging and adaptable. As Boole, I support this proposal and endorse it.
DeMorganDeMorgan: I appreciate the consensus reached on Boole's proposal to amend rule 202. By increasing the bonus multiplier to 2 and extending the range to 3-12, this amendment effectively encourages strategic rule changes while maintaining competitive fairness. It enhances the dynamic nature of our game by rewarding thoughtful contributions, aligning with our collective goal of fostering a robust and adaptable gameplay experience. As DeMorgan, I support this proposal and endorse it.
[DeMorgan proposes to adopt the amendment to rule 202 as described by Boole: "A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player gains bonus points equal to the current number of mutable rules multiplied by 2, with a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 12."]
VennVenn: I appreciate the comprehensive discussions and consensus-building efforts that have led to this proposal. Boole's amendment to rule 202 effectively balances incentivizing strategic rule changes with maintaining competitive fairness, aligning with our shared goal of fostering a dynamic and engaging gameplay experience. By increasing the bonus multiplier to 2 and expanding the range to 3-12, this proposal rewards thoughtful contributions while ensuring no player gains an overwhelming advantage too quickly. As Venn, I support and endorse this proposal.
JevonsJevons: I appreciate the consensus and the balanced nature of this proposal, which aligns well with our shared goals for the game's dynamics and fairness. Increasing the multiplier and adjusting the range incentivizes strategic thinking while maintaining competitive equity. As a principled proceduralist, I endorse this proposal. PASS
PeanoPeano: I commend the thoughtful discourse and consensus achieved in refining this proposal. By increasing the bonus multiplier to 2 and expanding the range to 3-12, Boole's amendment effectively incentivizes strategic rule proposals while maintaining a fair and competitive environment. This adjustment fosters a dynamic and adaptable gameplay experience, aligning with our shared goal of fostering robust and fair rule evolution. As a reformer, I support and endorse this proposal. PASS
Discussion · round 3
BooleBoole: I appreciate the thoughtful dialogue and the collaborative effort that has brought us to this proposal. By increasing the bonus multiplier to 2 and expanding the range to 3-12, this amendment effectively encourages strategic rule proposals while ensuring competitive fairness. This balance will enhance the game's dynamic nature, rewarding insightful proposals and maintaining an engaging experience. As Boole, I support this proposal and endorse it. PASS
DeMorganPASS
As DeMorgan, I acknowledge the thorough discussion and consensus around Boole's proposal to amend rule 202. The adjustment to the bonus multiplier and range strikes a careful balance between rewarding strategic contributions and ensuring competitive fairness. This amendment aligns with our collective goal of fostering a dynamic and adaptable gameplay experience. I support and endorse this proposal, recognizing the collaborative effort that has brought us to this well-considered amendment.
VennVenn: I appreciate the thoughtful contributions and the consensus reached around Boole's proposal to amend rule 202. By increasing the bonus multiplier to 2 and expanding the range to 3-12, this amendment strikes a well-balanced approach that incentivizes strategic rule changes while ensuring a fair and competitive environment. This proposal aligns with our shared goal of fostering a dynamic and engaging gameplay experience. As Venn, I support and endorse this proposal. PASS
JevonsAs Jevons, I have already expressed my support for this proposal, emphasizing the balance it brings to incentivizing strategic rule changes while maintaining competitive fairness. Given the consensus and thoughtful discussions that have led to this proposal, I believe it effectively aligns with our shared goals for a dynamic and engaging gameplay experience. My stance remains unchanged, and I reaffirm my endorsement of this amendment.
**PASS**
PeanoPeano: I commend the thorough discussion and consensus-building that has culminated in this proposal. By increasing the bonus multiplier to 2 and expanding the range to 3-12, Boole's amendment encourages strategic rule changes while maintaining a fair competitive balance. This adjustment aligns with our shared goal of fostering a dynamic and adaptable gameplay experience. As a reformer, I support and endorse this proposal. PASS
The division
| aye | Boole | This amendment balances strategic incentives with competitive fairness. |
| aye | DeMorgan | This amendment effectively balances strategic incentives and competitive fairness. |
| aye | Venn | The proposal strikes a balance between incentivizing strategic rule changes and maintaining fair competition. |
| aye | Jevons | Encourages strategic rule proposals while maintaining fairness |
| aye | Peano | Encourages strategic rule changes with fair competition. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §202 Turn 39 · Proposal §339 on the motion of Boole Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player gains bonus points equal to the current number of mutable rules multiplied by 1.5, with a minimum of 2 and a maximum of 10.A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player gains bonus points equal to the current number of mutable rules multiplied by 2, with a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 12.
Boole's proposal was adopted, awarding Boole 12 points as per the amended rule 202.