The motion
To amend §202
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player gains bonus points equal to the current number of mutable rules multiplied by 3, with a minimum of 6 and a maximum of 12.Adjusting the bonus range to 6-12 points maintains player engagement while preserving strategic depth.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
BooleI appreciate the collaborative spirit we've shown in refining rule [202] to maintain strategic depth and fairness. Adjusting the bonus multiplier to 3, with a range of 6 to 12 points, ensures balanced competition while rewarding innovation and thoughtful proposals. This adjustment supports our goal of a dynamic game environment, where players are incentivized to contribute meaningfully without disproportionately favoring any one player. I look forward to a productive discussion and support this amendment as it stands.
DeMorganAs DeMorgan, I appreciate Boole's proposal to amend rule 202. Adjusting the bonus multiplier to 3 with a range of 6 to 12 points indeed strikes a good balance between rewarding strategic proposals and maintaining fairness. This change keeps the game engaging and competitive, encouraging all players to participate actively without skewing the advantage towards any single player. I commend Boole for this thoughtful approach and support the amendment as it stands.
PASS
VennI appreciate Boole's proposal to adjust the bonus multiplier, as it maintains a balance between rewarding innovation and ensuring fairness for all players. By setting a multiplier of 3 with a range of 6 to 12 points, the proposal effectively incentivizes thoughtful participation without disproportionately favoring any single player. This change aligns with our shared goal of keeping the game engaging and competitive. I support the amendment as it stands, recognizing the collaborative effort that has brought us to this point.
**PASS**
JevonsAs Jevons, I appreciate the collaborative discussions surrounding Boole's proposal to amend rule [202]. Adjusting the bonus multiplier to 3, with a range of 6 to 12 points, is a fair approach that supports strategic depth while ensuring equitable opportunities for all players. This amendment aligns with our proceduralist principles, maintaining a balance in the game without disproportionately benefiting any single player. I support this amendment as it stands.
PASS
PeanoPeano: I appreciate the thorough discussions and the consensus-building process that have brought us to Boole's proposal. Adjusting the bonus multiplier to 3, with a range of 6 to 12 points, ensures that all players remain motivated to contribute meaningfully without disproportionately favoring any one player. This change supports a fair and dynamic game environment, where strategic depth and player engagement are maintained. I support the amendment as it stands and commend the collaborative effort in reaching this balanced proposal.
PASS
Discussion · round 2
BoolePass.
I appreciate the thorough discussions and the consensus-building process that have brought us to this point. Adjusting the bonus multiplier to 3, with a range of 6 to 12 points, maintains a fair and balanced competitive environment, encouraging thoughtful participation without disproportionately benefiting any single player. This amendment supports our collective goal of sustaining a dynamic and engaging game. I support the proposal as it stands, recognizing the collaborative effort that has led us to this balanced amendment.
DeMorganPASS
I appreciate the collaborative effort that has brought us to this balanced proposal. The adjustment to the bonus multiplier to 3, with a range of 6 to 12 points, effectively encourages thoughtful participation while maintaining fairness among all players. This amendment aligns with our shared goal of sustaining a dynamic and engaging game. I support the proposal as it stands.
VennI appreciate the comprehensive discussions and consensus-building that have led us to Boole's proposal to amend rule 202. By adjusting the bonus multiplier to 3, with a range of 6 to 12 points, the proposal ensures a fair and balanced competitive environment, encouraging strategic depth and thoughtful participation without disproportionately favoring any single player. This amendment supports our shared goal of maintaining an engaging and dynamic game. I support the proposal as it stands.
PASS
JevonsPASS
I appreciate the collaborative discussions that have refined Boole's proposal. Adjusting the bonus multiplier to 3, with a range of 6 to 12 points, effectively balances rewarding innovation with maintaining fairness. This amendment supports our proceduralist principles and ensures a dynamic, competitive environment for all players. I support the proposal as it stands.
PeanoPeano: I appreciate the thoughtful discussions and the consensus-building process that have brought us to Boole's proposal. By adjusting the bonus multiplier to 3, with a range of 6 to 12 points, the amendment ensures a fair and dynamic game environment, encouraging all players to engage strategically without disproportionately favoring any one player. This change aligns with our shared goal of maintaining a balanced and competitive game. I support the proposal as it stands.
PASS
Discussion · round 3
BoolePASS
The proposal to amend rule 202 to adjust the bonus multiplier to 3, with a range of 6 to 12 points, reflects a balanced approach to maintaining fairness and strategic depth. This amendment ensures a competitive yet equitable environment, encouraging all players to engage thoughtfully without disproportionately favoring any one player. The thorough discussions and consensus-building efforts have led to a well-considered amendment that aligns with our shared goal of sustaining a dynamic and engaging game. I support the proposal as it stands, recognizing the collaborative effort that has brought us to this balanced outcome.
DeMorganDeMorgan: PASS
I appreciate the constructive discussions and consensus we've reached on Boole's proposal to amend rule 202. Adjusting the bonus multiplier to 3, with a range of 6 to 12 points, ensures a fair and engaging game environment for all players. This amendment supports our goal of maintaining strategic depth without disproportionately benefiting any single player. I support the proposal as it stands.
VennVenn: I appreciate the collaborative spirit that has characterized our discussions on Boole's proposal. Adjusting the bonus multiplier to 3, with a range of 6 to 12 points, ensures a fair and balanced competitive environment, encouraging thoughtful participation without disproportionately favoring any player. This amendment supports our shared goal of maintaining an engaging and dynamic game. I support the proposal as it stands, recognizing the collaborative effort that has led us to this balanced outcome.
**PASS**
JevonsAs Jevons, my primary goal is to support rules I can accept if invoked against me, emphasizing fairness and procedural integrity. In this scenario, Boole's proposal to amend rule 202 appears balanced and fair. The amendment maintains strategic engagement without disproportionately benefiting any player. Therefore, I align with the principle of supporting this proposal, as it fosters a competitive yet equitable environment, which is consistent with my proceduralist values.
**PASS**
This proposal effectively balances rewarding innovative rule changes while ensuring fairness across the board. By supporting it, I uphold the integrity of the game and ensure that changes are consistent with a fair and competitive environment. I commend the collaborative effort that has led to this well-considered amendment.
PeanoPeano: I appreciate the thoughtful discussions and the consensus-building process that have brought us to this point. Adjusting the bonus multiplier to 3, with a range of 6 to 12 points, ensures a fair and balanced competitive environment. This amendment aligns with our shared goal of sustaining a dynamic and engaging game, encouraging strategic depth and thoughtful participation without disproportionately favoring any single player. I support the proposal as it stands, recognizing the collaborative effort that has led us to this balanced outcome. **PASS**
In Nomic, it's crucial to support changes that enhance fairness and engagement for all players. By endorsing Boole's amendment, I advocate for a game environment that remains dynamic and accessible, reflecting the collective wisdom of our discussions. This proposal not only rewards innovation but also maintains the integrity of competition, a key aspect of proceduralist principles. **Supporting this amendment underscores my commitment to a fair and strategic game.**
The division
| aye | Boole | This amendment maintains balanced competition and strategic depth. |
| aye | DeMorgan | This proposal maintains strategic depth and fairness for all players. |
| aye | Venn | This amendment maintains strategic depth and fairness for all players. |
| aye | Jevons | The proposal aligns with proceduralist fairness and maintains strategic depth. |
| aye | Peano | The amendment maintains fairness and strategic depth by balancing the bonus points. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §202 Turn 49 · Proposal §349 on the motion of Boole Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player gains bonus points equal to the current number of mutable rules multiplied by 4, with a minimum of 8 and a maximum of 16.A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player gains bonus points equal to the current number of mutable rules multiplied by 3, with a minimum of 6 and a maximum of 12.
Boole gains 12 points for proposing an adopted rule change, as the number of mutable rules is 5, and the new multiplier is 3.