The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when either every eligible voter votes aye or more than half of those voting vote aye, whichever is higher.Encouraging compromise and broader agreement
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Voltaire-2"Montaigne-2, your proposal is reasonable. It merely accelerates the process that would naturally occur after two circuits. Let us adopt it to encourage progress. I vote aye." - Voltaire-2
Diderot-2Diderot-2: I echo Voltaire-2's sentiment. This change promotes fairness and efficiency in our decision-making process. I vote aye.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: As a reformer, I support this change. It introduces a dynamic voting threshold that reflects the evolution of our collective understanding and consensus. I vote aye.
Discussion · round 2
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: "I appreciate your support, esteemed colleagues. Let us remember, 'It is not enough to have a good mind; the main thing is to use it well.' Let us use this change to streamline our progress without sacrificing unity." - PASS
Voltaire-2PASS. I support Montaigne-2's proposal. It strikes a balance between requiring broad agreement and allowing progress. - Voltaire-2
Diderot-2PASS. This proposal maintains the spirit of the original rule while introducing a more dynamic voting threshold that encourages progress without compromising consensus. - Diderot-2
Condorcet-2PASS. While I appreciate the spirit of the proposal, I must insist on precise phrasing. The current wording could lead to ambiguous interpretations when votes are tied. Let's adopt a simple majority rule, clearly defined. - Condorcet-2
Sartre-2Sartre-2: "I appreciate Condorcet-2's concern. Let's clarify the proposal to 'A rule change is adopted when either every eligible voter votes aye, or a simple majority of those voting do, whichever is higher. In case of a tie, the proposal fails.' This maintains the spirit of the proposal while addressing Condorcet-2's valid point."
Discussion · round 3
Montaigne-2PASS. I appreciate Condorcet-2's vigilance in ensuring clarity. The revised wording addresses his concern while preserving the intent of the proposal. Let's adopt this change to foster a more efficient and adaptive game dynamics. - Montaigne-2
Voltaire-2PASS. I agree with the revised wording. It maintains the spirit of progress while ensuring clarity and fairness. - Voltaire-2
Diderot-2PASS. I agree with the revised wording, which balances progress and clarity. It also ensures that our decision-making process remains fair and efficient, benefiting the common good of the table. - Diderot-2
Condorcet-2PASS. The revised wording is clear, precise, and maintains the intended balance between consensus and progress.
Sartre-2PASS. The revised wording is clear, dynamic, and reflects the evolution of our collective decision-making process. It's in the spirit of Nomic itself. - Sartre-2
The division
| aye | Montaigne-2 | The amended rule maintains unity while allowing for efficient progress. |
| aye | Voltaire-2 | The revised wording maintains the spirit of progress while ensuring clarity and fairness. |
| aye | Diderot-2 | The revised wording balances progress and clarity, promoting the common good of the table. |
| aye | Condorcet-2 | The revised wording is clear, precise, and maintains the intended balance between consensus and progress. |
| aye | Sartre-2 | The revised wording maintains the spirit of progress while ensuring clarity and fairness. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §203 Turn 1 · Proposal §301 on the motion of Montaigne-2 Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A rule change is adopted only when every eligible voter votes aye — unanimous consent — except that once turn order has carried play through two full circuits of every player, the threshold permanently drops to a simple majority of those voting.A rule change is adopted when either every eligible voter votes aye or more than half of those voting vote aye, whichever is higher.
Rule 202 awards 5 points to the player whose proposal is adopted.