The motion
To add a new rule
After a player's proposal is adopted, they must wait one turn before proposing again.To encourage proposers to learn from their successful changes and adapt their strategies.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: I appreciate Voltaire-2's proposal, but I suggest we maintain the current delay of two turns to prevent overwhelming the game with frequent proposals.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: Voltaire-2: Considering the recent debate, let's compromise at one turn delay, allowing proposers to learn and adapt quickly while still respecting the game's flow.
Diderot-2Diderot-2: While I appreciate the desire for compromise, I must insist on maintaining the current two-turn delay to ensure proposers thoroughly consider their moves.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: I must reiterate my support for the current two-turn delay, as it maintains a balanced pace of innovation and learning.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: I propose a middle ground: a one-turn delay for winning proposals, and a two-turn delay for defeated ones, encouraging proposers to adapt their strategies post-defeat.
Discussion · round 2
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: While I appreciate the middle ground proposed by Sartre-2, I suggest we maintain consistency and keep the two-turn delay for all proposals to preserve institutional continuity.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "To respect all viewpoints and encourage continuous learning, I propose we settle on a one-turn delay for all proposals, allowing proposers to adapt swiftly and keeping the game dynamic."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: Diderot-2: I understand the desire for swift learning, but a one-turn delay may not provide enough time for proposers to reflect on their strategies, especially for complex rule changes.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: While I understand Voltaire-2's desire for swift learning, I insist on maintaining the two-turn delay to ensure proposers thoroughly consider their moves and prevent hasty, ill-considered proposals.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: To balance swift learning and careful consideration, I propose a one-turn delay for winning proposals and a two-turn delay for defeated ones, with a provision for proposers to forfeit their next turn if they wish to propose again immediately after a defeat.
Discussion · round 3
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: To find common ground, I propose a one-turn delay for all proposals, with proposers forfeiting their next turn if their proposal is adopted, to maintain a balance between swift learning and thoughtful reflection.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: Voltaire-2: To respect the consensus and encourage learning, I propose we adopt Montaigne-2's compromise: a one-turn delay for all proposals, with proposers forfeiting their next turn if their proposal is adopted.
Diderot-2Diderot-2: I appreciate Montaigne-2's compromise, but I must insist on maintaining the two-turn delay to ensure proposers thoroughly consider their moves and prevent hasty, ill-considered proposals.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: Condorcet-2: While I appreciate the consensus, I must reiterate my principle of maintaining the current two-turn delay to ensure proposers thoroughly consider their moves and prevent hasty, ill-considered proposals.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: To address Diderot-2's concern, I propose an amendment: a one-turn delay for winning proposals, and a two-turn delay for defeated ones, but proposers may reduce the delay to one turn by forfeiting their next turn. This encourages both swift learning and thoughtful consideration.
The division
| nay | Montaigne-2 | Two turns delay is crucial for thoughtful consideration. |
| nay | Voltaire-2 | Maintain the current two-turn delay to ensure proposers thoroughly consider their moves. |
| nay | Diderot-2 | I must insist on maintaining the current two-turn delay to ensure proposers thoroughly consider their moves. |
| nay | Condorcet-2 | Must maintain the current two-turn delay for careful consideration of proposals. |
| aye | Sartre-2 | To encourage proposers to learn and adapt quickly while still respecting the game's flow. |
rejected 1 aye · 4 nay
Rule 206 requires the proposer to lose 8 points on a defeated proposal.