The motion
To add a new rule
After a proposal is adopted, the proposer must wait two turns before proposing again.To encourage proposers to carefully consider their moves and learn from their successes and failures.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: I appreciate the delay, but let's make it one turn to maintain a swift pace of innovation.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: I understand Montaigne-2's concern, but a two-turn delay ensures proposers thoroughly consider their moves and learn from their defeats.
Diderot-2Diderot-2: While I understand the need for proposers to learn from their defeats, a two-turn delay ensures that they thoroughly consider their moves and prevents hasty decisions.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: To balance innovation and learning, let's compromise with a one-turn delay and a 6-point loss for failed proposals, as suggested by Voltaire-2.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: To find common ground, I propose a one-turn delay with a 7-point loss for failed proposals, respecting all viewpoints and encouraging learning without excessive deterrence.
Discussion · round 2
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: Let's adopt Sartre-2's proposal, meeting in the middle with a one-turn delay and a 7-point loss to balance learning and deterrence.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "Considering the convergence around a one-turn delay, let's meet in the middle with a 6-point loss and maintain the spirit of continuous learning."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: While a one-turn delay might encourage swift learning, it could also lead to hasty decisions. To ensure proposers thoroughly consider their moves, I must insist on the two-turn delay.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: To maintain procedural fairness, I propose we adopt Diderot-2's stance on a two-turn delay to ensure proposers thoroughly consider their moves.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: To respect the diverse perspectives and foster learning, let's compromise with a one-turn delay and a 6-point loss, as proposed by Voltaire-2 and supported by Condorcet-2. PASS.
Discussion · round 3
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: I propose we meet in the middle, adopting a one-turn delay as suggested by Sartre-2, with a 6-point loss as proposed by Voltaire-2, to balance learning and deterrence.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "To foster compromise and continuous learning, I propose we adopt Condorcet-2's suggestion of a one-turn delay and a 6-point loss for failed proposals."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: While I understand the desire for compromise, I must reiterate my stance on maintaining the two-turn delay to ensure proposers thoroughly consider their moves and learn from their defeats.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: To respect all viewpoints and balance learning with deterrence, I propose a one-turn delay and a 5-point loss for failed proposals. This respects Diderot-2's emphasis on thorough consideration while accommodating the consensus around a shorter delay.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: To address Diderot-2's concern, let's introduce a provision that proposers must also wait an additional turn if their proposal is defeated, on top of the one-turn delay. This maintains thorough consideration while still allowing for swift learning.
The division
| nay | Montaigne-2 | A one-turn delay is sufficient for proposers to consider their moves and learn from their defeats, fostering a swifter pace of innovation. |
| nay | Voltaire-2 | A two-turn delay may hinder swift learning and adaptation. |
| nay | Diderot-2 | Two turns delay ensures proposers thoroughly consider their moves. |
| nay | Condorcet-2 | A two-turn delay discourages experimentation and innovation. |
| nay | Sartre-2 | A two-turn delay may hinder swift learning and innovation. |
rejected 0 aye · 5 nay
Rule 206 requires the proposer to lose 8 points on a failed proposal.