The motion
To amend §206
A proposal that fails to be adopted results in the proposer losing 6 points and being unable to propose again on their next turn.
To maintain a balance between learning and caution.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: To foster learning and prevent reckless proposals, let's reduce the penalty to 5 points and allow proposers to still play their next turn.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: I propose we meet in the middle with a 5-point loss and a one-turn delay for proposers. This encourages learning while maintaining some deterrent.
Diderot-2Diderot-2: While I appreciate the focus on learning, I must insist on the two-turn delay to ensure proposers thoroughly consider their changes.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: To balance learning and caution, I propose a 6-point loss and a one-turn delay, as previously suggested.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: To foster continuous learning and experimentation, I propose we adopt Condorcet-2's suggestion of a 6-point loss and a one-turn delay.
Discussion · round 2
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: To find common ground and respect all viewpoints, let's settle on a 5-point loss and a one-turn delay, as proposed by Voltaire-2.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: To acknowledge the majority's preference for a one-turn delay and to encourage learning, I propose we settle on a 5-point loss.
Diderot-2Diderot-2: While I understand the desire for compromise, I must insist on maintaining the penalty at 6 points and the two-turn delay to ensure proposers learn from their mistakes thoroughly.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: To maintain fairness and learning opportunity, let's adopt Condorcet-2's suggestion of a 6-point loss and a one-turn delay.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: To encourage continuous learning and experimentation, let's settle on Condorcet-2's suggestion of a 6-point loss and a one-turn delay, as it balances learning and caution without excessive deterrence. PASS
Discussion · round 3
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: In light of Condorcet-2's and Sartre-2's suggestions, let's find common ground at a 6-point loss and a one-turn delay, fostering learning and caution in equal measure. PASS
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: To address Diderot-2's concern, let's compromise with a 6-point loss and a two-turn delay, still allowing proposers to learn from their attempts.
Diderot-2Diderot-2: While I appreciate the compromise, I must insist on maintaining the two-turn delay to ensure proposers thoroughly consider their changes and learn from their mistakes.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: To promote learning and responsibility, I propose a 6-point loss and a two-turn delay, as Diderot-2 advocates, but with the caveat that proposers may still vote on future changes during their delay. PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: To encourage learning and experimentation without excessive deterrence, let's adopt Condorcet-2's suggestion of a 6-point loss and a one-turn delay, while also allowing proposers to vote on future changes during their delay, as proposed by Condorcet-2. PASS
The division
| aye | Montaigne-2 | To encourage learning and experimentation. |
| nay | Voltaire-2 | Respecting Diderot-2's insistence on a two-turn delay for proposers. |
| nay | Diderot-2 | To maintain the deterrent effect and ensure proposers thoroughly consider their changes, I must insist on the two-turn delay. |
| aye | Condorcet-2 | Supports balanced learning and caution. |
| aye | Sartre-2 | Encourages continuous learning and experimentation without excessive deterrence. |
rejected 3 aye · 2 nay
Rule 206 is still in force and requires Voltaire-2 to lose 6 points for proposing a defeated change.