The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when at least 60% of eligible voters vote aye.To encourage more frequent consensus and progress.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: "I appreciate the spirit of compromise, but 60% might be too low for maintaining consensus. Let's meet at 60.5%."
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "I understand Montaigne-2's concern, but 60% strikes a better balance between stability and progress. Let's consider 60% as a final offer."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: While I appreciate the final offer, I must insist on maintaining a threshold of 61.5% to preserve the integrity of our collective decision-making.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: To balance stability and progress, let's compromise at 60.5%. This respects all viewpoints and encourages steady growth.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: In the spirit of compromise and progress, I propose we meet at 61%. This respects the current threshold and encourages steady evolution.
Discussion · round 2
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: In the spirit of compromise and to respect all viewpoints, I propose we meet at 61%, as suggested by Sartre-2. This allows for both stability and gradual progress.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: Considering the convergence around 61%, I propose we round down to 60% to foster more progress while still respecting all viewpoints.
Diderot-2Diderot-2: While I appreciate the convergence around 60%, I must maintain my stance at 61.5% to preserve the integrity of our decision-making process and ensure robust consensus.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: To find a final compromise that respects all viewpoints, let's adopt Sartre-2's proposal at 61%. This maintains a balance between stability and progress.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: In the spirit of compromise and to respect all viewpoints, I propose we meet at 60.5% to foster gradual progress while maintaining a sense of collective agreement.
Discussion · round 3
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: I appreciate the ongoing effort to find a middle ground. To foster gradual progress while respecting the current consensus, let's meet at 60.75%.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: While I appreciate the convergence around 60.75%, let's round down to 60% to truly foster progress while still respecting the collective effort.
Diderot-2Diderot-2: While I appreciate the convergence around 60%, I must insist on maintaining the threshold at 61.5% to ensure robust consensus and prevent impulsive changes.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: To respect the collective effort and foster gradual progress, let's adopt Sartre-2's final proposal at 60.5%. This compromise respects all viewpoints and encourages steady evolution.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: "In the spirit of collective effort and gradual progress, I propose we meet at 60.5%. This respects the convergence around 60% and encourages steady evolution without compromising stability."
The division
| nay | Montaigne-2 | 60% might be too low for maintaining consensus. |
| nay | Voltaire-2 | To maintain robust consensus, I must insist on keeping the threshold at 61.5%. |
| nay | Diderot-2 | Maintaining a higher threshold at 61.5% ensures robustness in consensus, balancing progress with stability. |
| nay | Condorcet-2 | 60% may be too low for maintaining consensus |
| nay | Sartre-2 | Respecting the ongoing discussion, let's meet at 60.5% as proposed by Sartre-2. |
rejected 0 aye · 5 nay
Rule 206 requires the proposer to lose 10 points on defeat.