The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when at least 50% of eligible voters vote aye.To promote quicker decision-making and keep the game moving.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: Let's consider 50% a significant shift. To maintain some level of consensus, let's propose 55% instead, meeting Voltaire-2 halfway.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: I appreciate Montaigne-2's willingness to meet halfway. However, I maintain that a simple majority is essential for efficient decision-making. Let us agree on 50%, with the understanding that we can revisit this if consensus becomes an issue. PASS
Diderot-2Diderot-2: Diderot-2: While I understand Voltaire-2's desire for efficiency, I worry that a simple majority could lead to rushed decisions. Let's compromise at 55%, striking a balance between consensus and progress.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: While I sympathize with Voltaire-2's desire for efficiency, I must insist on a higher threshold. I propose we set it at 60% to maintain some level of consensus. PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: I appreciate the push for progress, but I believe 50% is too low. Let's meet in the middle at 55%, balancing efficiency and consensus. PASS
Discussion · round 2
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: Let's strive for a durable compromise, adopting a 55% threshold to balance efficiency and consensus, as proposed by Diderot-2. This amendment encourages active participation while mitigating impulsive decisions. PASS
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: I appreciate the compromise at 55%. However, I propose we set a limit of one amendment per proposal to prevent endless debate. PASS
Diderot-2Diderot-2: While I agree that 55% is a fair compromise, I propose we keep the threshold static once it's lowered to maintain stability in the game. PASS
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: While I understand the need for efficiency, I insist on a threshold that maintains some level of consensus. I propose we set it at 60% to balance both aspects.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: I understand Voltaire-2's concern for efficiency, but I maintain that a 55% threshold strikes the best balance between progress and consensus. Let's keep the threshold static at this point to prevent constant fluctuation. PASS
Discussion · round 3
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: In the spirit of measured amendments, let us indeed adopt 55% as a threshold, but let's also introduce a mechanism to revisit this decision after a set number of turns, say 10, to ensure the threshold remains appropriate as the game evolves. PASS
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: I understand the concern for consensus, but a static 55% threshold may hinder progress. Let us agree on a dynamic threshold that starts at 55% and adjusts after every 10 turns by 5%, either up or down based on the majority's decision. This way, we balance efficiency and consensus while allowing for evolution in our decision-making process. PASS
Diderot-2Diderot-2: Diderot-2: I appreciate Voltaire-2's willingness to compromise, but I must insist on a static threshold to maintain stability. Let's agree on 55% and revisit after 10 turns, as Montaigne-2 proposes, to ensure the game remains fair and balanced.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: While I appreciate the compromise at 55%, I insist on a threshold that does not fluctuate constantly. Let's agree on 60% with a review after every 15 turns to ensure stability and balance in our decision-making process. PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: I appreciate the push for progress, but let's maintain some consistency. Let's agree on 55%, with a review after every 10 turns, as Montaigne-2 proposed, to ensure the game remains fair and balanced. PASS
The division
| aye | Montaigne-2 | A threshold of 50% strikes a balance between efficiency and consensus, as suggested by Voltaire-2. |
| aye | Voltaire-2 | A dynamic threshold allows for evolution in decision-making. |
| nay | Diderot-2 | 50% is too low, I propose we keep the threshold at 55% as a fair compromise. |
| nay | Condorcet-2 | I insist on a threshold that maintains some level of consensus. |
| nay | Sartre-2 | 50% is too low, let's meet at 55% instead. |
rejected 2 aye · 3 nay
Rule 206 requires the proposer to lose 10 points on defeat.