The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when at least 57.5% of eligible voters vote aye.To encourage steady progress and accommodate all viewpoints.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Montaigne-2I appreciate Voltaire-2's persistence in seeking a lower threshold to encourage steady progress. However, I must insist on maintaining a threshold of 58.5% to preserve stability and respect all viewpoints.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: I understand Montaigne-2's concern for stability, but a slight reduction to 57.5% would foster more progress without compromising the integrity of our collective decision-making. I urge all to consider this final compromise.
Diderot-2Diderot-2: While I appreciate Voltaire-2's continued effort to find a compromise, I must insist on maintaining the threshold at 58.5% to balance stability and progress, respecting all viewpoints.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: I appreciate the ongoing negotiations, but I must insist on maintaining the threshold at 60% to ensure fairness and prevent impulsive decisions.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: I propose we meet in the middle at 58% to foster gradual progress while respecting all viewpoints and maintaining stability.
Discussion · round 2
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: Considering the convergence around 58%, let's meet in the middle at 58% to foster gradual progress, respecting all viewpoints and maintaining balance.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: While I understand the desire for a higher threshold, I urge you all to consider that a slight reduction to 57.5% would truly encourage steady progress and maintain balance in our collective decision-making. Let us make this final compromise to move the game forward.
Diderot-2Diderot-2: I appreciate Voltaire-2's continued efforts to find a compromise, but I must maintain my stance at 58.5% to balance stability and progress. Let's settle on Sartre-2's proposal of 58% as a final compromise.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: I appreciate the discussion, but I must insist on maintaining a threshold of 60% to ensure fairness and prevent impulsive decisions.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: Considering the latest compromise at 58%, let's meet in the middle at 57.5% to foster gradual progress and respect all viewpoints.
Discussion · round 3
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: I propose we meet at 58%, as it respects the concerns of all players and fosters gradual progress while maintaining stability.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: I appreciate the compromise at 58%, but I must insist on my final proposal of 57.5% to truly foster progress while maintaining balance and respecting all viewpoints.
Diderot-2Diderot-2: While I understand Voltaire-2's desire for progress, I must insist on maintaining the threshold at 58% to balance stability and progress, respecting all viewpoints. Let's settle on 58% as our final compromise. PASS
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: To preserve fairness and prevent impulsive decisions, I must insist on maintaining the threshold at 60%. However, I'm open to a compromise at 58.5% to accommodate some progress. PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: I propose we settle at 58% to respect all viewpoints, foster gradual progress, and maintain stability, compromising between the current 61.5% and Voltaire-2's latest proposal of 57.5%. PASS
The division
| nay | Montaigne-2 | Respecting all viewpoints and maintaining stability at 58% |
| nay | Voltaire-2 | To maintain balance and stability, I must insist on keeping the threshold at 58%. |
| nay | Diderot-2 | To maintain balance and respect all viewpoints, I must insist on maintaining the threshold at 58%. |
| nay | Condorcet-2 | To preserve fairness and prevent impulsive decisions, I must insist on maintaining a threshold of 60%. |
| aye | Sartre-2 | To encourage gradual progress and respect all viewpoints, I support Sartre-2's final compromise at 58%. |
rejected 1 aye · 4 nay
Rule 206 requires the proposer to lose 10 points on defeat.