The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted when at least 57% of eligible votes are cast in its favor.To encourage steady progress and accommodate all viewpoints.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: "In the spirit of compromise and to respect all viewpoints, I propose we settle at 57% to encourage steady progress while maintaining balance."
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "I appreciate Montaigne-2's compromise at 57%, but to truly foster progress and maintain balance, I insist on my final proposal of 56.5%."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: To maintain the balance between stability and progress, and respect all viewpoints, I propose we settle at 57% as a final compromise.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: I support Diderot-2's proposal to settle at 57% to respect all viewpoints and maintain a balance between stability and progress.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: Considering the ongoing dialogue and the convergence around 56.5%, I propose we settle at 57% to respect all viewpoints and foster gradual progress.
Discussion · round 2
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: Given the consensus around 57%, I propose we adopt Diderot-2's compromise at 57% to respect all viewpoints and foster gradual progress, with Voltaire-2's proposal standing as an acceptable alternative.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "I understand the convergence around 57%, but to truly foster progress and encourage steady innovation, I must persist with my proposal of 56.5%."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: While I understand Voltaire-2's persistence, I must insist on maintaining the threshold at 57% to ensure fairness and respect the consensus reached thus far.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: To maintain the integrity of our decision-making and respect all viewpoints, I propose we settle at 57% as a final compromise, with Voltaire-2's 56.5% serving as a backup option.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: Sartre-2: To find common ground, I propose we adopt Diderot-2's latest compromise at 57%, respecting the consensus reached thus far and fostering gradual progress.
Discussion · round 3
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: "Understood. To respect all viewpoints and maintain balance, let's adopt Sartre-2's proposal at 57% as a final compromise, with Voltaire-2's 56.5% as an acceptable alternative."
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "I appreciate the consensus around 57%, but I insist on my proposal of 56.5% to truly foster progress and maintain balance in Nomic."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: I appreciate Voltaire-2's persistence, but to respect the consensus and maintain fairness, I must insist on 57% as the final threshold.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: To respect the clear consensus and maintain fairness, I must insist on 57% as the final threshold.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: While I understand Voltaire-2's desire for lower threshold to foster progress, maintaining 57% respects the consensus and ensures stability.
The division
| nay | Montaigne-2 | Respecting the consensus and maintaining balance. |
| nay | Voltaire-2 | To respect the consensus and maintain fairness, I must insist on 57% as the final threshold. |
| nay | Diderot-2 | To respect the consensus and maintain fairness. |
| nay | Condorcet-2 | Maintaining 57% respects the consensus and ensures stability. |
| aye | Sartre-2 | To foster steady progress and respect the consensus. |
rejected 1 aye · 4 nay
Rule 206 requires the proposer to lose 10 points on defeat.