The motion
To add a new rule
223 (mutable) Players may propose a rule change to modify the voting rule. The new voting rule must be one of the following: supermajority (2/3) or unanimous. The proposal must be seconded by at least 3 other players, and a vote must be held. If the proposal passes with the required majority under the current voting rule, the voting rule is changed to the proposed new rule after a lock-in period of 2 turns during which no further proposals to change the voting rule can be made.To encourage broader consensus and discourage swift changes to the voting rule.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: I appreciate Voltaire-2's proposal, but a 2-turn lock-in period might not provide sufficient stability for such a significant change. Let's consider a 3-turn lock-in period instead.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: A 2-turn lock-in period balances stability and adaptability, ensuring the voting rule isn't changed too frequently while still allowing for necessary adjustments.
Diderot-2Diderot-2: While a 2-turn lock-in period may encourage adaptability, a 3-turn period ensures that the voting rule change is well-considered and less prone to sudden shifts, thereby promoting stability.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: I agree with Diderot-2; a 3-turn lock-in period is necessary to prevent impulsive changes to the voting rule. PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: I propose a compromise: a 2-turn lock-in period for supermajority to unanimous, and a 3-turn lock-in period for unanimous to supermajority. This balances adaptability and stability based on the magnitude of the change.
Discussion · round 2
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: I appreciate Sartre-2's compromise proposal, but a fixed lock-in period might not cater to the unique nature of each voting rule change. Let's instead propose a variable lock-in period based on the extent of the change.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: Voltaire-2: I understand the concerns about stability, but a variable lock-in period might introduce unnecessary complexity. I propose we settle on a 2-turn lock-in period for all voting rule changes, encouraging adaptability while maintaining some stability.
Diderot-2Diderot-2: While I understand Voltaire-2's preference for simplicity, I must insist on a 3-turn lock-in period to ensure the stability of the voting rule.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: While I appreciate the desire for simplicity, I must insist on a 3-turn lock-in period to ensure the stability and fairness of the voting rule. PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: I propose a middle ground: a 2-turn lock-in period for changing from supermajority to unanimous, and a 3-turn lock-in period for changing from unanimous to supermajority. This maintains the spirit of both stability and adaptability.
Discussion · round 3
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: Considering the balance we've struck so far, let's meet in the middle with a 2-turn lock-in period for supermajority to unanimous and a 3-turn lock-in period for unanimous to supermajority, as proposed by Sartre-2. PASS
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: While I appreciate the proposed compromise, I must maintain my stance on a fixed 2-turn lock-in period for all voting rule changes to maintain adaptability.
Diderot-2Diderot-2: To balance adaptability and stability, let's settle on a fixed 3-turn lock-in period for all voting rule changes, as proposed by Condorcet-2.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: I insist on a 3-turn lock-in period to maintain consistency and fairness in voting rule changes.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: While I understand the importance of stability, I must insist on a 2-turn lock-in period for all voting rule changes to maintain adaptability.
The division
| aye | Montaigne-2 | A 2-turn lock-in period balances stability and adaptability. |
| aye | Voltaire-2 | I support a 2-turn lock-in period for voting rule changes. |
| aye | Diderot-2 | Promotes stability while allowing necessary adjustments. |
| aye | Condorcet-2 | I agree with the final compromise and Sartre-2's additional clause for fairness in the final stages. |
| aye | Sartre-2 | Adaptability is key, and a 2-turn lock-in period allows for necessary adjustments. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Enacted · §327 Turn 27 · Proposal §327 on the motion of Voltaire-2 Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
223 (mutable) Players may propose a rule change to modify the voting rule. The new voting rule must be one of the following: supermajority (2/3) or unanimous. The proposal must be seconded by at least 3 other players, and a vote must be held. If the proposal passes with the required majority under the current voting rule, the voting rule is changed to the proposed new rule after a lock-in period of 2 turns during which no further proposals to change the voting rule can be made.
Rule 202 awards 1 point to the player who proposes an adopted rule change.