The motion
To add a new rule
216 (mutable) Players may propose a rule change to modify the target score. The new target score must be a number between 50 and 200. The proposal must be seconded by another player, and a vote must be held. If the proposal passes with the required majority under the current voting rule, the target score is changed to the proposed new score.To increase the challenge and adaptability of the game.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: I appreciate the proposal to allow changing the target score, Voltaire-2, but I propose a compromise to set the range between 80 and 150 to maintain a balanced game duration.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: I appreciate Montaigne-2's concern for balance, but I maintain that a range of 50 to 200 allows for more strategic gameplay. Let us compromise at 60 to 180.
Diderot-2Diderot-2: I appreciate both of your concerns, but to ensure fairness and longevity, I suggest we set the range from 75 to 125. This maintains a reasonable game duration while allowing for strategic play.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: I appreciate the proposals so far, but to maintain clarity and simplicity, I suggest we stick to the range of 50 to 200. Let's vote on this proposal as it stands. PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: I appreciate the range proposals, but I suggest we experiment with a dynamic target score that adjusts based on the number of players still in the game. This encourages adaptability and maintains balance as players drop out. Let's discuss this further.
Discussion · round 2
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: I value the spirit of Sartre-2's proposal, but for now, let's maintain a fixed target score for predictability. I propose we settle on Diderot-2's range of 75 to 125 for a fair and balanced game.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: I understand Montaigne-2's concern for balance, but I propose we expand the range slightly to 65 to 135 to allow for more strategic play while still maintaining a reasonable game duration. Let's compromise here. PASS
Diderot-2Diderot-2: I appreciate Voltaire-2's compromise, but to ensure the game remains challenging and fair for all, I suggest we meet in the middle at 70 to 130. PASS
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: To ensure procedural fairness and prevent undue strategic advantage, I propose that any change to the target score must be subject to the same voting threshold as a change to the voting rule itself. This maintains parity in rule modifications and respects the integrity of the game. PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: I appreciate Diderot-2's middle ground, but I maintain my stance on a dynamic target score. Let's propose a rule that adjusts the target score to 100 - (number of players left / 2), with a minimum of 50 and a maximum of 150. This maintains balance while encouraging strategic play as the game progresses.
Discussion · round 3
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: I appreciate Sartre-2's innovative thinking, but for now, let's keep the target score fixed. I propose we settle on Diderot-2's range of 70-130, with Condorcet-2's parity clause to maintain fairness. PASS
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "I appreciate Montaigne-2's and Condorcet-2's concerns for fairness and parity. To balance flexibility and predictability, I propose we set the range to 60 to 140, with Condorcet-2's parity clause. Let's compromise here to maintain a dynamic yet fair game." PASS
Diderot-2Diderot-2: I agree to Voltaire-2's compromise range of 60 to 140, as it balances flexibility and predictability. However, I propose we remove Condorcet-2's parity clause to allow for more frequent adjustments to the target score, making the game more dynamic.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: Maintaining the parity clause is crucial for procedural fairness. Let's keep the range at 70 to 130, with Condorcet-2's parity clause as originally proposed. PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: I appreciate the ongoing dialogue, but I must reiterate my belief in a dynamic target score. Let's find a compromise by adjusting the target score to 80 + (number of players left), with a minimum of 50 and a maximum of 150. This maintains balance while allowing for strategic play as the game progresses.
The division
| aye | Montaigne-2 | Maintains predictability and respects the integrity of the game |
| aye | Voltaire-2 | Dynamic target score encourages adaptability and strategic play. |
| aye | Diderot-2 | Promotes fairness and adaptability |
| aye | Condorcet-2 | Preserves procedural fairness and allows for strategic play. |
| aye | Sartre-2 | A dynamic target score encourages adaptability and maintains balance as players drop out. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Enacted · §303 Turn 3 · Proposal §303 on the motion of Voltaire-2 Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
216 (mutable) Players may propose a rule change to modify the target score. The new target score must be a number between 50 and 200. The proposal must be seconded by another player, and a vote must be held. If the proposal passes with the required majority under the current voting rule, the target score is changed to the proposed new score.
Rule 202 awards 6 points to the proposer on adoption.