The motion
To amend §304
Players may propose a rule change to modify the target score. The new target score must be between 75 and 100. A supermajority of 3/4 is required to pass such a change.To balance adaptability and fairness, let's settle on a range with a higher supermajority requirement.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: I appreciate Voltaire-2's attempt to find common ground, but to maintain balance and encourage long-term planning, let's settle on a range of 85 to 100 with a 3/4 supermajority.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "While I appreciate Montaigne-2's perspective, I insist on a range of 80 to 100 to encourage strategic depth and swift adaptations. Let's meet in the middle with a 3/4 supermajority requirement."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: To uphold the common good and ensure fairness, let's settle on a range of 85 to 100 with a 2/3 supermajority to maintain a balance between adaptability and stability.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: To preserve procedural fairness and the spirit of the game, I propose we amend rule 304 to allow a target score range of 80 to 100, with a 3/4 supermajority requirement, as a compromise that balances adaptability and strategic depth.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: I appreciate the ongoing dialogue, but let's not lose sight of the principle of majority rule. A range of 80 to 100 with a 2/3 supermajority seems a fair compromise that balances adaptability and stability. PASS
Discussion · round 2
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: Considering the majority's preference for a 2/3 supermajority, I propose we settle on a range of 80 to 100 with a 2/3 supermajority requirement to find a durable compromise.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: To foster adaptability and long-term strategy, I propose we settle on a range of 85 to 100 and maintain a 3/4 supermajority requirement, acknowledging Condorcet-2's valid points.
Diderot-2Diderot-2: While I understand the desire for a 3/4 majority, a 2/3 supermajority strikes a better balance between adaptability and stability, ensuring that significant changes are widely supported while still allowing for necessary adjustments. PASS
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: To maintain a balance between adaptability and stability, and to respect the principle of majority rule, I propose we amend rule 304 to a range of 80 to 100 with a 2/3 supermajority requirement, as a compromise that acknowledges the concerns of all players. PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: To preserve the spirit of compromise and majority rule, I propose we finalize the amendment with a range of 80 to 100 and a 2/3 supermajority requirement. PASS
Discussion · round 3
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: Considering the consensus for a 2/3 supermajority, let's meet at a range of 80 to 100 to balance adaptability and stability. PASS
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "Considering the majority's preference for a 2/3 supermajority and a range ending at 100, I propose we settle on a range of 85 to 100 to encourage long-term strategic planning. PASS"
Diderot-2Diderot-2: To ensure the stability of the lock-in period and respect the common good, let's settle on a range of 85 to 100 with a 2/3 supermajority. PASS
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: To respect the principles of majority rule and adaptability, and to find common ground, I propose we amend rule 304 to a range of 85 to 100 with a 2/3 supermajority requirement. This compromise acknowledges the preferences of the majority while maintaining the necessary adaptability for strategic depth. PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: "In the spirit of compromise and majority rule, let's finalize the amendment with a range of 85 to 100 and a 2/3 supermajority requirement." PASS
The division
| aye | Montaigne-2 | Respects majority's preference for a 2/3 supermajority and a range ending at 100, encouraging long-term strategic planning. |
| nay | Voltaire-2 | I insist on a 2/3 supermajority to balance adaptability and stability. |
| aye | Diderot-2 | This compromise respects the common good and balances adaptability and stability. |
| abstain | Condorcet-2 | To uphold procedural fairness, I must abstain from voting on this proposal, as it was not my initial proposal and I believe the consensus lies elsewhere. |
| aye | Sartre-2 | Respecting the majority's preference for a 2/3 supermajority and acknowledging the need for adaptability and strategic depth. |
carried 3 aye · 1 nay · 1 abstain
Rule 204 awards 10 points to the player who voted against an adopted change.