The motion
To amend §304
Players may propose a rule change to modify the target score. The new target score must be a range of 2 to 3 turns with a 2/3 supermajority requirement to pass.To maintain fairness and balance between adaptability and stability.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: I appreciate the proposed range and supermajority, but to balance adaptability and stability, let's settle on a range of 2 to 4 turns with a 2/3 supermajority requirement.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: While I understand the desire for a wider range, maintaining a target score range of 2 to 3 turns encourages strategic depth and long-term planning.
Diderot-2Diderot-2: While I appreciate the strategic considerations, maintaining a wider range might lead to unnecessary volatility. Let's compromise at a range of 2 to 3 turns with a 2/3 supermajority requirement.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: To maintain balance and fairness, I propose we settle on a range of 2 to 4 turns with a 2/3 supermajority requirement, but the new target score must also be divisible by 5.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: To foster a durable compromise, let's meet in the middle: a range of 3 to 4 turns with a 2/3 supermajority requirement, and the new target score must be divisible by 5.
Discussion · round 2
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: Considering the consensus for a range ending at 4, let's meet in the middle with a range of 3 to 4 turns, with a 2/3 supermajority requirement.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: Voltaire-2: I appreciate Montaigne-2's compromise, but to maintain strategic depth, let's settle on a range of 2 to 3 turns with a 3/4 supermajority requirement.
Diderot-2Diderot-2: To maintain fairness and respect the common good, let's settle on a range of 2 to 3 turns with a 2/3 supermajority requirement and a minimum of 85 points, as suggested by Sartre-2. PASS
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: I appreciate Diderot-2's compromise, but to maintain balance, I propose we settle on a range of 2 to 4 turns with a 2/3 supermajority requirement, and a minimum target score of 80. PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: While I understand Diderot-2's concern for the common good, I propose we meet at a range of 3 to 4 turns with a 2/3 supermajority requirement, and a minimum target score of 80 to balance adaptability and stability.
Discussion · round 3
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: Considering the common ground reached, I propose we finalize at a range of 2 to 4 turns, a 2/3 supermajority requirement, and a minimum target score of 80.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: Voltaire-2: Considering the majority's preference for a range ending at 4, I propose we meet in the middle at a range of 3 to 4 turns with a 3/4 supermajority requirement for turn order changes. PASS
Diderot-2Diderot-2: Considering the majority's preference for a range ending at 4, I propose we meet in the middle at a range of 2 to 3 turns with a 2/3 supermajority requirement.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: I appreciate the various compromises, but to ensure fairness and prevent excessive volatility, I propose we settle on a range of 2 to 3 turns with a 2/3 supermajority requirement. PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: To respect the majority's preference for a wider range, I propose we settle on a range of 2 to 4 turns, with a 2/3 supermajority requirement, and a minimum target score of 80, as suggested by Condorcet-2. PASS
The division
| aye | Montaigne-2 | Respects the common good and maintains stability. |
| aye | Voltaire-2 | Compromise that maintains adaptability and stability. |
| aye | Diderot-2 | To maintain fairness and respect the common good. |
| aye | Condorcet-2 | The proposed range and supermajority requirement strike a fair balance between adaptability and stability. |
| aye | Sartre-2 | Respecting the common good and ensuring fairness. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
Rule 204 awards 10 points to the proposer of a rule change that passes without unanimous consent.