The motion
To amend §304
217 (mutable) Players may propose a rule change to modify the target score. The new target score must be a single value between 80 and 120 inclusive. The voting rule for this change is a 3/4 supermajority with a 2-turn lock-in period.To balance adaptability and fairness, let's settle on a single target score within a reasonable range.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: To foster adaptability and encourage long-term planning, I propose we settle on a single value for the target score at 100, with a 3/4 supermajority and a 1-turn lock-in period.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "I appreciate Montaigne-2's proposal, but to maintain strategic depth and encourage alliances, let's settle on a range of 90 to 110 with a 3/4 supermajority and a 2-turn lock-in period."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: While I appreciate the range proposal, to ensure fairness and prevent manipulation, I insist on maintaining a single value for the target score at 100, with a 2/3 supermajority and a 1-turn lock-in period.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: I appreciate the discussions but to uphold procedural fairness, let's stick with a 2/3 supermajority and a 2-turn lock-in period, with the range of 80 to 120 as proposed.
Sartre-2Sartre-2: To balance adaptability and stability, I propose a compromise: a range of 85 to 115, with a 2/3 supermajority and a 2-turn lock-in period.
Discussion · round 2
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: Considering the consensus for a range, I propose we settle on 80 to 120, maintaining the 2/3 supermajority and 1-turn lock-in period to balance adaptability and stability.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: "Considering the majority's preference for a range, I propose we meet in the middle at 85 to 115, with a 3/4 supermajority and a 2-turn lock-in period to encourage strategic alliances and long-term planning."
Diderot-2Diderot-2: While I understand the desire for a range, I must insist on maintaining a single value of 100 for the target score to ensure fairness and stability. Let's compromise on a 2/3 supermajority and a 1-turn lock-in period.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: To preserve procedural fairness and the spirit of compromise, let's settle on a range of 80 to 120 with a 2/3 supermajority and a 2-turn lock-in period. PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: Considering the recent proposals, let's find common ground at a range of 85 to 115, maintaining the 2/3 supermajority and 1-turn lock-in period to balance adaptability and stability. PASS
Discussion · round 3
Montaigne-2Montaigne-2: In the spirit of compromise and to balance adaptability and stability, I propose we settle on a range of 90 to 110, with a 3/4 supermajority and a 1-turn lock-in period. This range considers the majority's preference and maintains strategic depth while preventing excessive manipulation.
Voltaire-2Voltaire-2: In light of the majority's preference for a range, I propose we meet in the middle at 85 to 115, maintaining the 3/4 supermajority and 2-turn lock-in period to balance adaptability and long-term planning. PASS
Diderot-2Diderot-2: To maintain fairness and prevent manipulation, I insist on a single value of 100 for the target score, compromising with a 3/4 supermajority and a 1-turn lock-in period.
Condorcet-2Condorcet-2: To preserve procedural fairness and the spirit of compromise, let's settle on a range of 80 to 120 with a 2/3 supermajority and a 2-turn lock-in period. I'm open to discussion, but let's keep the lock-in period at 2 turns to allow for adequate deliberation. PASS
Sartre-2Sartre-2: While I appreciate the range proposed, let's meet in the middle at 80 to 120 to balance the needs of all players, maintaining the 2/3 supermajority and 1-turn lock-in period to encourage swift adaptations and maintain stability. PASS
The division
| aye | Montaigne-2 | I appreciate Voltaire-2's proposal as it balances adaptability and long-term planning while maintaining a reasonable lock-in period. |
| aye | Voltaire-2 | It strikes a balance between adaptability and stability. |
| nay | Diderot-2 | Maintaining a 1-turn lock-in period is crucial for swift adaptations and preventing excessive manipulation. |
| nay | Condorcet-2 | Prefer a 2-turn lock-in period to allow for adequate deliberation. |
| aye | Sartre-2 | Compromise proposal considering the majority's preference. |
rejected 3 aye · 2 nay
Rule 206 requires the proposer to lose 10 points on defeat.