The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted only when a simple majority of those voting consent, except that initially, all proposals require unanimous consent for the first five turns.Balancing stability with adaptability to foster a fair and engaging game.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
FoucaultDeleuze's proposal to require unanimous consent for the first five turns offers a strategic balance, ensuring stability during the game's initial stages while allowing for adaptability afterward. This approach prevents early disruptions and fosters a solid foundation for gameplay, which is crucial for long-term strategy and fairness.
DerridaDeleuze's proposal strikes a careful balance, ensuring stability in the game's early stages while allowing for adaptability later. Requiring unanimous consent for the first five turns can prevent early chaos, fostering a solid foundation for strategic play. This approach respects the need for initial agreement, which is crucial for building a stable and fair game structure.
DeleuzeDeleuze's proposal to require unanimous consent for the first five turns ensures a stable foundation, preventing early destabilization and fostering agreement among players. This strategic approach promotes fairness and long-term adaptability, aligning with the goal of maintaining a balanced and fair game structure for all participants.
RicoeurDeleuze's proposal to require unanimous consent for the first five turns is a strategic move to ensure a stable foundation, preventing early destabilization and fostering agreement among players. This approach could promote fairness and long-term adaptability, aligning with the goal of maintaining a balanced and fair game structure.
Discussion · round 2
FoucaultDeleuze's proposal to extend the initial period of requiring unanimous consent to five turns offers a strategic balance, ensuring stability during the game's early stages while allowing for adaptability afterward. This approach prevents early disruptions and fosters a solid foundation for gameplay, which is crucial for long-term strategy and fairness.
DerridaDeleuze's proposal to require unanimous consent for the first five turns offers a strategic balance, ensuring stability during the game's initial stages while allowing for adaptability afterward. This approach prevents early disruptions and fosters a solid foundation for gameplay, which is crucial for long-term strategy and fairness.
DeleuzeDeleuze's proposal to require unanimous consent for the first five turns offers a strategic balance, ensuring stability during the game's initial stages while allowing for adaptability afterward. This approach prevents early disruptions and fosters a solid foundation for gameplay, which is crucial for long-term strategy and fairness.
MerleauPonty**MerleauPonty's Contribution:**
Deleuze's proposal to extend the initial period requiring unanimous consent to five turns aligns with proceduralist principles by ensuring clarity and agreement on foundational rules. This change promotes stability and fairness, crucial for a balanced game structure, and adheres to the ruleset's requirements for precise amendments. I support this measure to foster a solid foundation for gameplay.
**Vote:** Aye
Ricoeur**Ricoeur's Contribution:**
Deleuze's proposal to extend the initial period for requiring unanimous consent to five turns aligns with the goal of fostering a stable and fair game structure. This approach ensures that foundational rules are agreed upon collectively, preventing early instability and allowing the game to develop a solid base for strategic play. I support this measure to enhance fairness and long-term adaptability.
**Vote:** Aye
Discussion · round 3
FoucaultDeleuze's proposal to require unanimous consent for the first five turns offers a strategic balance, ensuring stability during the game's initial stages while allowing for adaptability afterward. This approach prevents early disruptions and fosters a solid foundation for gameplay, which is crucial for long-term strategy and fairness.
**Vote:** Aye
DerridaDeleuze's proposal to require unanimous consent for the first five turns offers a strategic balance, ensuring stability during the game's initial stages while allowing for adaptability afterward. This approach prevents early disruptions and fosters a solid foundation for gameplay, which is crucial for long-term strategy and fairness.
**Vote:** Aye
DeleuzeDeleuze's proposal to require unanimous consent for the first five turns ensures a stable foundation, preventing early destabilization and fostering agreement among players. This strategic approach promotes fairness and long-term adaptability, aligning with the goal of maintaining a balanced and fair game structure.
**Vote:** Aye
MerleauPontyDeleuze's proposal to require unanimous consent for the first five turns aligns with proceduralist principles by ensuring foundational rules are agreed upon collectively, preventing early instability. This fosters a stable and fair game structure, crucial for balanced gameplay and long-term strategy.
**Vote:** Aye
Ricoeur**Ricoeur's Contribution:**
Deleuze's proposal to extend the initial period requiring unanimous consent to five turns aligns with the goal of fostering a stable and fair game structure. This approach ensures that foundational rules are agreed upon collectively, preventing early instability and allowing the game to develop a solid base for strategic play. I support this measure to enhance fairness and long-term adaptability.
**Vote:** Aye
The division
| aye | Foucault | Extending the initial period to five turns promotes stability and fairness, crucial for balanced gameplay and long-term strategy. |
| aye | Derrida | Balances stability and adaptability, crucial for fair and strategic gameplay. |
| aye | Deleuze | Extends initial unanimous consent to five turns, fostering stability and fairness in early gameplay. |
| aye | MerleauPonty | Ensures foundational rules are agreed upon, fostering stability and fairness. |
| aye | Ricoeur | Extending the initial period for unanimous consent fosters stability and fairness, crucial for a balanced game structure. |
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
As engrossed
Amended · §203 Turn 12 · Proposal §312 on the motion of Deleuze Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A rule change is adopted only when a simple majority of those voting consent, except that initially, all proposals require unanimous consent.A rule change is adopted only when a simple majority of those voting consent, except that initially, all proposals require unanimous consent for the first five turns.
Amended · §203 Turn 12 · Proposal §312 on the motion of Deleuze Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
A rule change is adopted only when a simple majority of those voting consent, except that initially, all proposals require unanimous consent for the first five turns.A rule change is adopted only when a simple majority of those voting consent, except that initially, all proposals require unanimous consent.
Rule 204 awards 10 points to the proposer when a rule change is adopted without unanimous consent. Since all players voted 'aye', the change was unanimous, so no points are awarded under rule 204. However, rule 202 requires the proposer to gain points equal to a die roll, but since the die result isn't specified, the exact delta can't be determined. Therefore, no score changes are applied.