The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted only when a two-thirds majority of those voting consent, regardless of the turn number.Stabilizes the game by maintaining a consistent voting threshold.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
FoucaultI support MerleauPonty's proposal, as it maintains the necessary stability in the early game while ensuring that all rule changes are thoroughly considered. However, I caution that removing the turn-based threshold may slow down adaptation later. A balanced approach could allow for some flexibility while preserving the two-thirds majority for critical changes.
DeleuzeI support MerleauPonty's proposal as it ensures that rule changes are thoroughly considered, promoting stability and fairness. However, I encourage careful consideration of how this might affect the game's adaptability and the incentive for players to collaborate on meaningful changes.
MerleauPontyI believe maintaining the two-thirds majority ensures that rule changes are carefully considered and supported, promoting stability and fairness. It eliminates the arbitrary transition after ten turns and ensures consistency in decision-making, which is crucial for a balanced and enjoyable gameplay.
Discussion · round 2
FoucaultI support MerleauPonty's proposal. It simplifies the voting process by maintaining a consistent threshold, ensuring that all rule changes are rigorously considered. While it may slow adaptation post-ten turns, the increased stability and fairness it provides are crucial for maintaining a balanced and enjoyable gameplay.
DerridaI appreciate MerleauPonty's proposal to maintain the two-thirds majority, as it ensures thoughtful consideration of rule changes. However, I suggest retaining the simple majority after ten turns to allow for adaptability and quicker adjustments as the game progresses. This balance would preserve stability while enabling the game to evolve dynamically.
DeleuzeI support MerleauPonty's proposal. It ensures that rule changes are thoroughly considered, promoting stability and fairness. While it may slow adaptation post-ten turns, the increased stability and fairness it provides are crucial for maintaining a balanced and enjoyable gameplay.
RicoeurI appreciate the emphasis on stability, but I caution that maintaining the two-thirds majority indefinitely could stifle the game's ability to adapt. While thorough consideration is valuable, we must ensure the ruleset remains responsive to the game's evolving dynamics. Let us see how this plays out and be ready to revisit if needed.
Discussion · round 3
FoucaultI appreciate the thoughtful discussion, but I remain convinced that maintaining the two-thirds majority indefinitely would unduly hinder the game's adaptability. While stability is important, the original structure allows for a measured transition to simpler majority voting after ten turns, which better serves the game's long-term health. I encourage us to retain that balance.
DerridaI support MerleauPonty's proposal to maintain the two-thirds majority, as it ensures thoughtful consideration of rule changes. However, I suggest retaining the simple majority after ten turns to allow for adaptability and quicker adjustments as the game progresses. This balance would preserve stability while enabling the game to evolve dynamically.
DeleuzeI support MerleauPonty's proposal as it ensures that rule changes are thoroughly considered, promoting stability and fairness. It eliminates the arbitrary transition after ten turns and ensures consistency in decision-making, which is crucial for a balanced and enjoyable gameplay.
RicoeurI appreciate the emphasis on stability, but I caution that maintaining the two-thirds majority indefinitely could stifle the game's ability to adapt. While thorough consideration is valuable, we must ensure the ruleset remains responsive to the game's evolving dynamics. Let us see how this plays out and be ready to revisit if needed.
The division
| nay | Foucault | Balanced adaptability is crucial for the game's long-term health. |
| abstain | Derrida | Balanced approach preserves adaptability while maintaining stability. |
| aye | Deleuze | Promotes stability and fairness by ensuring thorough consideration of rule changes. |
| aye | MerleauPonty | Maintains a consistent threshold for rule changes, promoting stability and fairness. |
| aye | Ricoeur | Maintains stability and ensures thorough consideration of rule changes. |
carried 3 aye · 1 nay · 1 abstain
As engrossed
Amended · §203 Turn 29 · Proposal §329 on the motion of MerleauPonty Carried 3 aye · 1 nay · 1 abstain
A rule change is adopted only when a two-thirds majority of those voting consent for the first ten turns, and a simple majority thereafter. Immutable rule changes continue to require unanimous consent.A rule change is adopted only when a two-thirds majority of those voting consent, regardless of the turn number.
Rule 204 awards 15 points to the proposer and 5 points to each player who voted against the adopted proposal.