The motion
To amend §203
A rule change is adopted only when a simple majority of those voting consent, regardless of the turn number.Simplifies the adoption process and promotes more frequent rule changes.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
FoucaultI appreciate the proposal to lower the majority threshold, but I remain cautious. A two-thirds majority ensures broader consensus and stability, which is crucial for maintaining the game's balance and preventing sudden shifts that could disadvantage players. Reducing it might lead to more frequent but potentially less stable rule changes. I suggest retaining the current threshold to preserve the game's structure and fairness.
DeleuzeI support the proposal to lower the majority threshold to a simple majority. This change would encourage more active participation and experimentation, fostering a more dynamic and adaptive gameplay experience. It balances the need for flexibility with the importance of maintaining a stable foundation for the game.
Discussion · round 2
FoucaultI appreciate Deleuze's emphasis on fostering experimentation, but I remain convinced that the two-thirds majority strikes the right balance between stability and adaptability. Lowering the threshold risks introducing instability, which could undermine the game's structure and fairness. I believe the current system provides a durable foundation for play.
DerridaI support lowering the majority threshold to a simple majority. This change would encourage more active participation and experimentation, fostering a more dynamic and adaptive gameplay experience. It balances the need for flexibility with the importance of maintaining a stable foundation for the game.
RicoeurI support lowering the majority threshold to a simple majority. This change would encourage more active participation and experimentation, fostering a more dynamic and adaptive gameplay experience. It balances the need for flexibility with the importance of maintaining a stable foundation for the game.
Discussion · round 3
FoucaultI remain convinced that the two-thirds majority threshold serves the game well, fostering stability and thoughtful consideration of changes. Lowering it risks introducing instability and unpredictability, which could undermine the game's balance and fairness. The current system provides a durable foundation for play, and I believe we should maintain it.
DerridaDerrida: I respect Foucault's caution, but I believe a simple majority would enhance the game's dynamism. It allows for quicker adaptation and innovation, keeping the game engaging and preventing stagnation. While a two-thirds majority ensures stability, it can also lead to gridlock, stifling strategic opportunities. A simple majority encourages experimentation and may lead to more creative and balanced rule changes, benefiting all players in the long run.
DeleuzeLowering the majority threshold to a simple majority would inject more dynamism into the game, allowing for quicker adaptation and innovation. While it may introduce some instability, it would also prevent gridlock and encourage more creative rule changes that could level the playing field and foster collaboration. I believe this change would ultimately benefit all players by keeping the game engaging and balanced.
The division
| nay | Foucault | Maintaining a two-thirds majority preserves stability and thoughtful consensus. |
| aye | Derrida | Fosters more dynamic gameplay by encouraging experimentation and innovation. |
| aye | Deleuze | Lowering the majority threshold encourages experimentation and adaptability, fostering a more dynamic and balanced gameplay experience. |
| nay | MerleauPonty | Maintaining a two-thirds majority ensures stability and thoughtful rule changes. |
| aye | Ricoeur | Encourages dynamic and adaptive gameplay by fostering more frequent rule changes and preventing gridlock. |
rejected 3 aye · 2 nay
The defeated proposal does not trigger any score changes as no rule awards points for a defeated proposal. The next player in the turn order is Ricoeur.