The motion
To amend §204
A player who votes against an adopted rule change gains 5 points and remains bound by the change exactly as if they had voted for it. The proposer of an adopted rule change gains 20 points, while each player who voted against it gains 5 points.Incentivizing leadership and strategic contributions while maintaining balance.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
FoucaultI concur with Derrida's proposal to increase the proposer's reward to 20 points while maintaining the 5-point penalty for voting against. This change encourages more strategic leadership and active participation, fostering a dynamic game environment.
DerridaI support Derrida's amendment. It rewards leadership and encourages strategic participation, fostering a more dynamic game environment.
DeleuzeI support Derrida's proposal. Increasing the proposer's reward to 20 points encourages leadership and initiative, while maintaining a 5-point reward for voting against ensures players still have an incentive to participate in decisions, fostering a balanced and dynamic game environment.
MerleauPontyI support Derrida's amendment. Increasing the proposer's reward to 20 points while maintaining a 5-point penalty for voting against adopted rules better incentivizes leadership and active participation. This change respects the procedural integrity of the game while encouraging players to take initiative and propose meaningful rule changes.
RicoeurI support Derrida's proposal to increase the proposer's reward to 20 points. This change incentivizes leadership and strategic initiative, promoting a more dynamic and competitive game environment. By rewarding the proposer more, it encourages players to take charge and propose meaningful changes, while maintaining the 5-point reward for voting against ensures all players remain engaged and contribute to decision-making.
</think>
I support Derrida's proposal. Increasing the proposer's reward to 20 points encourages leadership and initiative, while maintaining the 5-point reward for voting against ensures all players remain engaged. This change fosters a more dynamic and competitive game environment.
Discussion · round 2
FoucaultI concur with Derrida's proposal to increase the proposer's reward to 20 points while maintaining the 5-point penalty for voting against. This change encourages more strategic leadership and active participation, fostering a dynamic game environment.
DerridaI support Derrida's proposal. Increasing the proposer's reward to 20 points encourages leadership and initiative, while maintaining the 5-point reward for voting against ensures all players remain engaged. This change fosters a more dynamic and competitive game environment.
DeleuzeI support Derrida's proposal. Increasing the proposer's reward to 20 points encourages leadership and initiative, while maintaining the 5-point reward for voting against ensures all players remain engaged. This change fosters a more dynamic and competitive game environment.
MerleauPontyI support Derrida's proposal. Increasing the proposer's reward to 20 points encourages leadership and initiative, while maintaining the 5-point reward for voting against ensures all players remain engaged. This change fosters a more dynamic and competitive game environment.
RicoeurI support Derrida's proposal. Increasing the proposer's reward to 20 points encourages leadership and initiative, while maintaining the 5-point reward for voting against ensures all players remain engaged. This change fosters a more dynamic and competitive game environment.
Discussion · round 3
DerridaI support Derrida's proposal. Increasing the proposer's reward to 20 points encourages leadership and initiative, while maintaining the 5-point reward for voting against ensures all players remain engaged. This change fosters a more dynamic and competitive game environment.
---
**Vote: Aye**
Deleuze**Vote: Aye**
I support Derrida's proposal. Increasing the proposer's reward to 20 points encourages leadership and initiative, while maintaining the 5-point reward for voting against ensures all players remain engaged. This change fosters a more dynamic and competitive game environment.
MerleauPontyI support Derrida's proposal. Increasing the proposer's reward to 20 points encourages leadership and initiative, while maintaining the 5-point reward for voting against ensures all players remain engaged. This change fosters a more dynamic and competitive game environment.
**Vote: Aye**
Ricoeur**Vote: Aye**
I support Derrida's proposal. Increasing the proposer's reward to 20 points encourages leadership and initiative, while maintaining the 5-point reward for voting against ensures all players remain engaged. This change fosters a more dynamic and competitive game environment.
The division
| abstain | Foucault | (unintelligible ballot) |
| aye | Derrida | Encourages leadership and strategic initiative while maintaining engagement for all players. |
| aye | Deleuze | Increasing the proposer's reward encourages leadership and initiative, fostering a more dynamic game environment. |
| aye | MerleauPonty | Encourages leadership and initiative while maintaining fair participation. |
| aye | Ricoeur | Increases proposer incentive while maintaining voting engagement. |
carried 4 aye · 0 nay · 1 abstain
As engrossed
Amended · §204 Turn 38 · Proposal §338 on the motion of Derrida Carried 4 aye · 0 nay · 1 abstain
A player who votes against an adopted rule change gains 10 points and remains bound by the change exactly as if they had voted for it. The proposer of an adopted rule change gains 15 points, while each player who voted against it gains 5 points.A player who votes against an adopted rule change gains 5 points and remains bound by the change exactly as if they had voted for it. The proposer of an adopted rule change gains 20 points, while each player who voted against it gains 5 points.
Amended · §204 Turn 38 · Proposal §338 on the motion of Derrida Carried 4 aye · 0 nay · 1 abstain
A player who votes against an adopted rule change gains 5 points and remains bound by the change exactly as if they had voted for it. The proposer of an adopted rule change gains 20 points, while each player who voted against it gains 5 points.A player who votes against an adopted rule change gains 10 points and remains bound by the change exactly as if they had voted for it. The proposer of an adopted rule change gains 15 points, while each player who voted against it gains 5 points.
Rule 204 was amended to award 20 points to the proposer and 5 points to each against voter. Derrida proposed and adopted the change, so he gains 20 points. Foucault abstained, so no points are awarded to others.