The motion
To amend §204
A player who votes against an adopted rule change gains 5 points, while the proposer gains 25 points.To encourage more strategic and successful proposals by increasing the reward for proposers.
The floor
Discussion · round 1
FoucaultPASS. While I appreciate the intent to incentivize leadership, I remain cautious about increasing the proposer's reward too significantly without addressing the balance between proposers and those who vote against.
DerridaI support MerleauPonty's proposal to increase the proposer's reward to 25 points. This change incentivizes leadership and strategic initiative, which are crucial for dynamic gameplay. While I understand the caution, the increased reward maintains a balance that encourages more players to take the lead, fostering a more active and competitive environment.
DeleuzePASS. I appreciate the intent to incentivize leadership, but I remain cautious about increasing the proposer's reward too significantly without addressing the balance between proposers and those who vote against.
MerleauPontyPASS. While I understand the desire to incentivize leadership, I remain cautious about increasing the proposer's reward without further balancing the voting mechanic.
RicoeurPASS. While I appreciate the intent to incentivize leadership, I remain cautious about increasing the proposer's reward without further balancing the voting mechanic.
Discussion · round 2
FoucaultPASS. While I appreciate the intent to incentivize leadership, I remain cautious about increasing the proposer's reward too significantly without addressing the balance between proposers and those who vote against.
DerridaI support MerleauPonty's proposal to increase the proposer's reward to 25 points. This change incentivizes leadership and strategic initiative, which are crucial for dynamic gameplay. While I understand the caution, the increased reward maintains a balance that encourages more players to take the lead, fostering a more active and competitive environment.
DeleuzePASS. While I understand the intent to encourage leadership, I remain cautious about increasing the proposer's reward without further balancing the system.
MerleauPontyPASS. While I understand the intent to incentivize leadership, I remain cautious about increasing the proposer's reward without further balancing the voting mechanic.
RicoeurPASS. While I understand the intent to incentivize leadership, I remain cautious about increasing the proposer's reward without further balancing the voting mechanic.
Discussion · round 3
FoucaultPASS. While I appreciate the intent to incentivize leadership, I remain cautious about increasing the proposer's reward too significantly without addressing the balance between proposers and those who vote against.
DerridaI support MerleauPonty's proposal to increase the proposer's reward to 25 points. This change incentivizes leadership and strategic initiative, crucial for dynamic gameplay. While I understand the caution, the increased reward maintains a balance that encourages more players to take the lead, fostering a more active and competitive environment.
DeleuzePASS. I appreciate the intent to incentivize leadership, but I remain cautious about increasing the proposer's reward without further balancing the voting mechanic.
MerleauPontyPASS. While I appreciate the intent to incentivize leadership, I remain cautious about increasing the proposer's reward without further balancing the voting mechanic.
RicoeurPASS. While I understand the intent to incentivize leadership, I remain cautious about increasing the proposer's reward without further balancing the voting mechanic.
The division
| nay | Foucault | Maintaining the current balance incentivizes leadership without overwhelming the system. |
| aye | Derrida | Encourages leadership and strategic initiative while maintaining a balanced incentive structure. |
| abstain | Deleuze | Balancing the reward system is crucial to maintain fairness and encourage strategic voting. |
| abstain | MerleauPonty | To maintain balance and ensure all players have a meaningful role. |
| abstain | Ricoeur | To avoid potential imbalance and maintain system equilibrium. |
rejected 1 aye · 1 nay · 3 abstain
Rule [206] mandates a defeated proposer loses points based on their score, resulting in MerleauPonty losing 1 point.