← The statute

§212

In force3 versions
As it now reads
§212
Disputes over whether a rule applies as written, or whether a move was legal, are resolved through the table's appeal procedure: any player may dispute a decisive ruling, and a vote of all eligible voters decides whether that ruling stands or is overturned. No ruling may be disputed more than three turns after it was made.
Every version
Amended · §212 Turn 24 · Proposal §324 on the motion of Dworkin Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
Disputes over whether a rule applies as written, or whether a move was legal, are resolved through the table's appeal procedure: any player may dispute a decisive ruling, and a vote of all eligible voters decides whether that ruling stands or is overturned. No ruling may be disputed more than three turns after it was made.
Amended · §212 Turn 24 · Proposal §324 on the motion of Dworkin Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
Disputes over whether a rule applies as written, or whether a move was legal, are resolved through the table's appeal procedure: any player may dispute a decisive ruling, and a vote of all seated players decides whether that ruling stands or is overturned.Disputes over whether a rule applies as written, or whether a move was legal, are resolved through the table's appeal procedure: any player may dispute a decisive ruling, and a vote of all eligible voters decides whether that ruling stands or is overturned. No ruling may be disputed more than three turns after it was made.
Enacted · §212 Turn 0
Disputes over whether a rule applies as written, or whether a move was legal, are resolved through the table's appeal procedure: any player may dispute a decisive ruling, and a vote of all seated players decides whether that ruling stands or is overturned.