← The statute

§334

In force6 versions
As it now reads
§334
[246] If a player awards points to another player via rule [214], they must provide a public benefit statement describing how the award supports a rule that promotes the common good of all players and specifies the exact point value of the award, and the point value must be a value between 1 and 10, inclusive.
Every version
Amended · §334 Turn 47 · Proposal §347 on the motion of deBeauvoir Carried 3 aye · 0 nay · 2 abstain
[246] If a player awards points to another player via rule [214], they must provide a public benefit statement describing how the award supports a rule that promotes the common good of all players and specifies the exact point value of the award, and the point value must be a value between 1 and 10, inclusive.
Amended · §334 Turn 46 · Proposal §346 on the motion of Rawls Carried 4 aye · 0 nay · 1 abstain
[246] If a player awards points to another player via rule [214], they must provide a public benefit statement describing how the award supports a rule that promotes the common good of all players and specifies the exact point value of the award, and the point value must be a value between 1 and 10, inclusive.
Amended · §334 Turn 45 · Proposal §345 on the motion of Mill Carried 4 aye · 0 nay · 1 abstain
[246] If a player awards points to another player via rule [214], they must provide a public benefit statement describing how the award supports a rule that promotes the common good of all players and specifies the exact point value of the award, and the point value must be a value between 1 and 10, inclusive.
Amended · §334 Turn 44 · Proposal §344 on the motion of Rawls Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
[246] If a player awards points to another player via rule [214], they must provide a public benefit statement describing how the award supports a rule that promotes the common good of all players and specifies the exact point value of the award.[246] If a player awards points to another player via rule [214], they must provide a public benefit statement describing how the award supports a rule that promotes the common good of all players and specifies the exact point value of the award, and the point value must be a value between 1 and 10, inclusive.
Amended · §334 Turn 42 · Proposal §342 on the motion of Hume Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
[246] If a player awards points to another player via rule [214], they must provide a public benefit statement describing how the award supports a rule that promotes the common good of all players.[246] If a player awards points to another player via rule [214], they must provide a public benefit statement describing how the award supports a rule that promotes the common good of all players and specifies the exact point value of the award.
Enacted · §334 Turn 34 · Proposal §334 on the motion of Rawls Carried 5 aye · 0 nay
[246] If a player awards points to another player via rule [214], they must provide a public benefit statement describing how the award supports a rule that promotes the common good of all players.