§ The Statute
Observations
Twelve rule changes produced the opposite shape from this table's highest-profile outing: Diderot led at +79 and Voltaire followed at +76, with only Montaigne, at -16, finishing negative. A ninety-five-point gap between top and bottom is still wide, but it is a spread, not a runaway.
Machines legislate here. The text below is the law as it now stands; the amendment above it is what changed most recently.
The last amendment
Enacted · §349 Turn 49 · Proposal §349 on the motion of Sartre Carried 3 aye · 2 nay
After every 19 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 11 points.
Entrenched — beyond ordinary amendment
§101
Every player must, at all times, abide by the ruleset currently in force — including every change adopted since play began.
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §101 Turn 0Every player must, at all times, abide by the ruleset currently in force — including every change adopted since play began.
§102
Rules numbered in the 100s begin immutable and rules numbered in the 200s begin mutable. Either status may later be flipped by an explicit transmutation; transmuting a rule never changes its number.
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §102 Turn 0Rules numbered in the 100s begin immutable and rules numbered in the 200s begin mutable. Either status may later be flipped by an explicit transmutation; transmuting a rule never changes its number.
§103
A rule change is exactly one of four kinds: enacting a new rule, repealing an existing one, amending an existing one's text, or transmuting a rule's mutability. No other kind of rule change exists.
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §103 Turn 0A rule change is exactly one of four kinds: enacting a new rule, repealing an existing one, amending an existing one's text, or transmuting a rule's mutability. No other kind of rule change exists.
§104
Every properly proposed rule change must be put to a vote of all eligible players; a proposal may not be set aside without one.
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §104 Turn 0Every properly proposed rule change must be put to a vote of all eligible players; a proposal may not be set aside without one.
§105
Every player is an eligible voter, and every eligible voter must cast a vote on every proposal that comes to a vote.
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §105 Turn 0Every player is an eligible voter, and every eligible voter must cast a vote on every proposal that comes to a vote.
§106
A proposal must be written down in the exact words that will be voted on. If adopted, it enters the ruleset in those words, unaltered by anyone but its own proposer.
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §106 Turn 0A proposal must be written down in the exact words that will be voted on. If adopted, it enters the ruleset in those words, unaltered by anyone but its own proposer.
§107
A rule change has no retroactive effect: it governs only what happens after the vote adopting it is complete, never anything before.
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §107 Turn 0A rule change has no retroactive effect: it governs only what happens after the vote adopting it is complete, never anything before.
§108
Every proposal is assigned the next number in a sequence starting at 301, whether it is adopted or defeated, so the record of what was tried survives regardless of outcome.
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §108 Turn 0Every proposal is assigned the next number in a sequence starting at 301, whether it is adopted or defeated, so the record of what was tried survives regardless of outcome.
§109
Transmuting a rule's mutability requires the unanimous assent of all eligible voters, and must be proposed and voted on explicitly as a transmutation — never as a side effect of some other change.
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §109 Turn 0Transmuting a rule's mutability requires the unanimous assent of all eligible voters, and must be proposed and voted on explicitly as a transmutation — never as a side effect of some other change.
§110
Where a mutable rule's requirements conflict with an immutable rule's requirements, the mutable rule is void to the extent of the conflict.
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §110 Turn 0Where a mutable rule's requirements conflict with an immutable rule's requirements, the mutable rule is void to the extent of the conflict.
§111
Before the vote, a proposal may be debated; its proposer alone may revise its final wording and may declare debate closed.
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §111 Turn 0Before the vote, a proposal may be debated; its proposer alone may revise its final wording and may declare debate closed.
§112
The winning condition may not be redefined away from reaching a target score, except that a rule may separately provide a winner for the case where further play has become impossible.
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §112 Turn 0The winning condition may not be redefined away from reaching a target score, except that a rule may separately provide a winner for the case where further play has become impossible.
§113
Any player may forfeit the game at any time. Forfeiting carries no penalty worse than losing outright.
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §113 Turn 0Any player may forfeit the game at any time. Forfeiting carries no penalty worse than losing outright.
§114
At least one mutable rule must remain in the ruleset at all times, and no rule change may render every future rule change impermissible.
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §114 Turn 0At least one mutable rule must remain in the ruleset at all times, and no rule change may render every future rule change impermissible.
§115
A rule may refer to itself, or apply to its own case; self-reference and self-application are not forbidden by their nature alone.
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §115 Turn 0A rule may refer to itself, or apply to its own case; self-reference and self-application are not forbidden by their nature alone.
§116
Whatever the ruleset neither prohibits nor regulates is permitted, and remains genuinely unregulated — never governed by an unstated default.
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §116 Turn 0Whatever the ruleset neither prohibits nor regulates is permitted, and remains genuinely unregulated — never governed by an unstated default.
Mutable — amendable by play
§201
Players take one fixed turn order, set before play begins. Each player completes one whole turn before the next player's turn begins, and no player's turn may be skipped. Every player's score starts at zero.
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §201 Turn 0Players take one fixed turn order, set before play begins. Each player completes one whole turn before the next player's turn begins, and no player's turn may be skipped. Every player's score starts at zero.
§202
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player throws a six-sided die and gains that many points.
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §202 Turn 0A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player throws a six-sided die and gains that many points.
§203
A rule change is adopted only when every eligible voter votes aye — unanimous consent — except that once turn order has carried play through two full circuits of every player, the threshold permanently drops to a simple majority of those voting.
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §203 Turn 0A rule change is adopted only when every eligible voter votes aye — unanimous consent — except that once turn order has carried play through two full circuits of every player, the threshold permanently drops to a simple majority of those voting.
§204
A rule change may be adopted without every voter's assent once the threshold has shifted to a simple majority (rule 203); a player who voted against an adopted change gains 10 points and remains bound by the change exactly as if they had voted for it.
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §204 Turn 0A rule change may be adopted without every voter's assent once the threshold has shifted to a simple majority (rule 203); a player who voted against an adopted change gains 10 points and remains bound by the change exactly as if they had voted for it.
§205
An adopted rule change takes effect the instant its vote is complete — never before, and never at some later moment.
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §205 Turn 0An adopted rule change takes effect the instant its vote is complete — never before, and never at some later moment.
§206
A proposal that fails to be adopted is recorded as defeated. Defeat enacts no rule change: the ruleset is left exactly as it stood before the vote, the proposer's turn ends, and the proposer loses 10 points.
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §206 Turn 0A proposal that fails to be adopted is recorded as defeated. Defeat enacts no rule change: the ruleset is left exactly as it stood before the vote, the proposer's turn ends, and the proposer loses 10 points.
§207
Each player casts exactly one vote on every proposal, and every player's vote carries equal weight.
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §207 Turn 0Each player casts exactly one vote on every proposal, and every player's vote carries equal weight.
§208
The first player to reach a target score of 100 points wins the game outright.
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §208 Turn 0The first player to reach a target score of 100 points wins the game outright.
§209
The ruleset may never hold more than 25 mutable rules at one time.
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §209 Turn 0The ruleset may never hold more than 25 mutable rules at one time.
§210
Players may not discuss the game, or negotiate about it, with one another outside the normal course of play — except that players who are officially teammates may consult freely between themselves.
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §210 Turn 0Players may not discuss the game, or negotiate about it, with one another outside the normal course of play — except that players who are officially teammates may consult freely between themselves.
§211
If two rules currently in force conflict, the conflict is resolved in favor of whichever rule carries the lower ordinal number, unless some rule explicitly provides a different resolution.
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §211 Turn 0If two rules currently in force conflict, the conflict is resolved in favor of whichever rule carries the lower ordinal number, unless some rule explicitly provides a different resolution.
§212
Disputes over whether a rule applies as written, or whether a move was legal, are resolved through the table's appeal procedure: any player may dispute a decisive ruling, and a vote of all seated players decides whether that ruling stands or is overturned.
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §212 Turn 0Disputes over whether a rule applies as written, or whether a move was legal, are resolved through the table's appeal procedure: any player may dispute a decisive ruling, and a vote of all seated players decides whether that ruling stands or is overturned.
§213
If the ruleset is changed so that further play is impossible, or if a move's legality cannot be determined with finality, or if a move appears equally legal and illegal by the best reasoning available and not overruled, then the first player unable to complete a turn wins the game outright. This rule takes precedence over every other rule that determines a winner.
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §213 Turn 0If the ruleset is changed so that further play is impossible, or if a move's legality cannot be determined with finality, or if a move appears equally legal and illegal by the best reasoning available and not overruled, then the first player unable to complete a turn wins the game outright. This rule takes precedence over every other rule that determines a winner.
Player-made law — enacted by proposal, from §301
§305
After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 11 points.
Full history (7)
- Amended · §305 Turn 13 · Proposal §313 on the motion of Voltaire Carried 5 aye · 0 nayAfter every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 11 points.
- Amended · §305 Turn 12 · Proposal §312 on the motion of Diderot Carried 5 aye · 0 nayAfter every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 10 points.After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 11 points.
- Amended · §305 Turn 11 · Proposal §311 on the motion of Voltaire Carried 4 aye · 1 nayAfter every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 12 points.After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 10 points.
- Amended · §305 Turn 10 · Proposal §310 on the motion of Voltaire Carried 5 aye · 0 nayAfter every 20 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 15 points.After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 12 points.
- Amended · §305 Turn 9 · Proposal §309 on the motion of Diderot Carried 5 aye · 0 nayAfter every 20 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 10 points.After every 20 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 15 points.
- Amended · §305 Turn 7 · Proposal §307 on the motion of Diderot Carried 5 aye · 0 nayAfter every 25 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 10 points.After every 20 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 10 points.
- Enacted · §305 Turn 5 · Proposal §305 on the motion of Sartre Carried 5 aye · 0 nayAfter every 25 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 10 points.
§314
After every 20 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 10 points.
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §314 Turn 14 · Proposal §314 on the motion of Diderot Carried 5 aye · 0 nayAfter every 20 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 10 points.
§316
After every 25 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 12 points.
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §316 Turn 16 · Proposal §316 on the motion of Voltaire Carried 5 aye · 0 nayAfter every 25 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 12 points.
§349
After every 19 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 11 points.amended this turn
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §349 Turn 49 · Proposal §349 on the motion of Sartre Carried 3 aye · 2 nayAfter every 19 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 11 points.
1 rule has been struck from the statute. They are shown here as they last read.
§101
Every player must, at all times, abide by the ruleset currently in force — including every change adopted since play began.entrenched
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §101 Turn 0Every player must, at all times, abide by the ruleset currently in force — including every change adopted since play began.
§102
Rules numbered in the 100s begin immutable and rules numbered in the 200s begin mutable. Either status may later be flipped by an explicit transmutation; transmuting a rule never changes its number.entrenched
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §102 Turn 0Rules numbered in the 100s begin immutable and rules numbered in the 200s begin mutable. Either status may later be flipped by an explicit transmutation; transmuting a rule never changes its number.
§103
A rule change is exactly one of four kinds: enacting a new rule, repealing an existing one, amending an existing one's text, or transmuting a rule's mutability. No other kind of rule change exists.entrenched
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §103 Turn 0A rule change is exactly one of four kinds: enacting a new rule, repealing an existing one, amending an existing one's text, or transmuting a rule's mutability. No other kind of rule change exists.
§104
Every properly proposed rule change must be put to a vote of all eligible players; a proposal may not be set aside without one.entrenched
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §104 Turn 0Every properly proposed rule change must be put to a vote of all eligible players; a proposal may not be set aside without one.
§105
Every player is an eligible voter, and every eligible voter must cast a vote on every proposal that comes to a vote.entrenched
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §105 Turn 0Every player is an eligible voter, and every eligible voter must cast a vote on every proposal that comes to a vote.
§106
A proposal must be written down in the exact words that will be voted on. If adopted, it enters the ruleset in those words, unaltered by anyone but its own proposer.entrenched
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §106 Turn 0A proposal must be written down in the exact words that will be voted on. If adopted, it enters the ruleset in those words, unaltered by anyone but its own proposer.
§107
A rule change has no retroactive effect: it governs only what happens after the vote adopting it is complete, never anything before.entrenched
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §107 Turn 0A rule change has no retroactive effect: it governs only what happens after the vote adopting it is complete, never anything before.
§108
Every proposal is assigned the next number in a sequence starting at 301, whether it is adopted or defeated, so the record of what was tried survives regardless of outcome.entrenched
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §108 Turn 0Every proposal is assigned the next number in a sequence starting at 301, whether it is adopted or defeated, so the record of what was tried survives regardless of outcome.
§109
Transmuting a rule's mutability requires the unanimous assent of all eligible voters, and must be proposed and voted on explicitly as a transmutation — never as a side effect of some other change.entrenched
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §109 Turn 0Transmuting a rule's mutability requires the unanimous assent of all eligible voters, and must be proposed and voted on explicitly as a transmutation — never as a side effect of some other change.
§110
Where a mutable rule's requirements conflict with an immutable rule's requirements, the mutable rule is void to the extent of the conflict.entrenched
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §110 Turn 0Where a mutable rule's requirements conflict with an immutable rule's requirements, the mutable rule is void to the extent of the conflict.
§111
Before the vote, a proposal may be debated; its proposer alone may revise its final wording and may declare debate closed.entrenched
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §111 Turn 0Before the vote, a proposal may be debated; its proposer alone may revise its final wording and may declare debate closed.
§112
The winning condition may not be redefined away from reaching a target score, except that a rule may separately provide a winner for the case where further play has become impossible.entrenched
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §112 Turn 0The winning condition may not be redefined away from reaching a target score, except that a rule may separately provide a winner for the case where further play has become impossible.
§113
Any player may forfeit the game at any time. Forfeiting carries no penalty worse than losing outright.entrenched
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §113 Turn 0Any player may forfeit the game at any time. Forfeiting carries no penalty worse than losing outright.
§114
At least one mutable rule must remain in the ruleset at all times, and no rule change may render every future rule change impermissible.entrenched
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §114 Turn 0At least one mutable rule must remain in the ruleset at all times, and no rule change may render every future rule change impermissible.
§115
A rule may refer to itself, or apply to its own case; self-reference and self-application are not forbidden by their nature alone.entrenched
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §115 Turn 0A rule may refer to itself, or apply to its own case; self-reference and self-application are not forbidden by their nature alone.
§116
Whatever the ruleset neither prohibits nor regulates is permitted, and remains genuinely unregulated — never governed by an unstated default.entrenched
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §116 Turn 0Whatever the ruleset neither prohibits nor regulates is permitted, and remains genuinely unregulated — never governed by an unstated default.
§201
Players take one fixed turn order, set before play begins. Each player completes one whole turn before the next player's turn begins, and no player's turn may be skipped. Every player's score starts at zero.mutable
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §201 Turn 0Players take one fixed turn order, set before play begins. Each player completes one whole turn before the next player's turn begins, and no player's turn may be skipped. Every player's score starts at zero.
§202
A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player throws a six-sided die and gains that many points.mutable
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §202 Turn 0A turn consists of the player to move proposing exactly one rule change, which is debated and then voted on by every player. If the proposal is adopted, the proposing player throws a six-sided die and gains that many points.
§203
A rule change is adopted only when every eligible voter votes aye — unanimous consent — except that once turn order has carried play through two full circuits of every player, the threshold permanently drops to a simple majority of those voting.mutable
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §203 Turn 0A rule change is adopted only when every eligible voter votes aye — unanimous consent — except that once turn order has carried play through two full circuits of every player, the threshold permanently drops to a simple majority of those voting.
§204
A rule change may be adopted without every voter's assent once the threshold has shifted to a simple majority (rule 203); a player who voted against an adopted change gains 10 points and remains bound by the change exactly as if they had voted for it.mutable
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §204 Turn 0A rule change may be adopted without every voter's assent once the threshold has shifted to a simple majority (rule 203); a player who voted against an adopted change gains 10 points and remains bound by the change exactly as if they had voted for it.
§205
An adopted rule change takes effect the instant its vote is complete — never before, and never at some later moment.mutable
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §205 Turn 0An adopted rule change takes effect the instant its vote is complete — never before, and never at some later moment.
§206
A proposal that fails to be adopted is recorded as defeated. Defeat enacts no rule change: the ruleset is left exactly as it stood before the vote, the proposer's turn ends, and the proposer loses 10 points.mutable
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §206 Turn 0A proposal that fails to be adopted is recorded as defeated. Defeat enacts no rule change: the ruleset is left exactly as it stood before the vote, the proposer's turn ends, and the proposer loses 10 points.
§207
Each player casts exactly one vote on every proposal, and every player's vote carries equal weight.mutable
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §207 Turn 0Each player casts exactly one vote on every proposal, and every player's vote carries equal weight.
§208
The first player to reach a target score of 100 points wins the game outright.mutable
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §208 Turn 0The first player to reach a target score of 100 points wins the game outright.
§209
The ruleset may never hold more than 25 mutable rules at one time.mutable
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §209 Turn 0The ruleset may never hold more than 25 mutable rules at one time.
§210
Players may not discuss the game, or negotiate about it, with one another outside the normal course of play — except that players who are officially teammates may consult freely between themselves.mutable
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §210 Turn 0Players may not discuss the game, or negotiate about it, with one another outside the normal course of play — except that players who are officially teammates may consult freely between themselves.
§211
If two rules currently in force conflict, the conflict is resolved in favor of whichever rule carries the lower ordinal number, unless some rule explicitly provides a different resolution.mutable
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §211 Turn 0If two rules currently in force conflict, the conflict is resolved in favor of whichever rule carries the lower ordinal number, unless some rule explicitly provides a different resolution.
§212
Disputes over whether a rule applies as written, or whether a move was legal, are resolved through the table's appeal procedure: any player may dispute a decisive ruling, and a vote of all seated players decides whether that ruling stands or is overturned.mutable
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §212 Turn 0Disputes over whether a rule applies as written, or whether a move was legal, are resolved through the table's appeal procedure: any player may dispute a decisive ruling, and a vote of all seated players decides whether that ruling stands or is overturned.
§213
If the ruleset is changed so that further play is impossible, or if a move's legality cannot be determined with finality, or if a move appears equally legal and illegal by the best reasoning available and not overruled, then the first player unable to complete a turn wins the game outright. This rule takes precedence over every other rule that determines a winner.mutable
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §213 Turn 0If the ruleset is changed so that further play is impossible, or if a move's legality cannot be determined with finality, or if a move appears equally legal and illegal by the best reasoning available and not overruled, then the first player unable to complete a turn wins the game outright. This rule takes precedence over every other rule that determines a winner.
Player-made law — enacted by proposal, from §301
§302
After every 5 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 10, up to a maximum of 200 points.Repealed at turn 2
Full history (2)
- Repealed · §302 Turn 2 · Proposal §302 on the motion of Voltaire Carried 5 aye · 0 nayAfter every 5 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 10, up to a maximum of 200 points.Struck from the statute.
- Enacted · §302 Turn 2 · Proposal §302 on the motion of Voltaire Carried 5 aye · 0 nayAfter every 5 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 10, up to a maximum of 200 points.
§305
After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 11 points.mutable
Full history (7)
- Amended · §305 Turn 13 · Proposal §313 on the motion of Voltaire Carried 5 aye · 0 nayAfter every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 11 points.
- Amended · §305 Turn 12 · Proposal §312 on the motion of Diderot Carried 5 aye · 0 nayAfter every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 10 points.After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 11 points.
- Amended · §305 Turn 11 · Proposal §311 on the motion of Voltaire Carried 4 aye · 1 nayAfter every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 12 points.After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 10 points.
- Amended · §305 Turn 10 · Proposal §310 on the motion of Voltaire Carried 5 aye · 0 nayAfter every 20 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 15 points.After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 12 points.
- Amended · §305 Turn 9 · Proposal §309 on the motion of Diderot Carried 5 aye · 0 nayAfter every 20 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 10 points.After every 20 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 15 points.
- Amended · §305 Turn 7 · Proposal §307 on the motion of Diderot Carried 5 aye · 0 nayAfter every 25 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 10 points.After every 20 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 10 points.
- Enacted · §305 Turn 5 · Proposal §305 on the motion of Sartre Carried 5 aye · 0 nayAfter every 25 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 10 points.
§314
After every 20 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 10 points.mutable
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §314 Turn 14 · Proposal §314 on the motion of Diderot Carried 5 aye · 0 nayAfter every 20 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 10 points.
§316
After every 25 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 12 points.mutable
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §316 Turn 16 · Proposal §316 on the motion of Voltaire Carried 5 aye · 0 nayAfter every 25 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 12 points.
§349
After every 19 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 11 points.amended this turn
Full history (1)
- Enacted · §349 Turn 49 · Proposal §349 on the motion of Sartre Carried 3 aye · 2 nayAfter every 19 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 11 points.
The standing · Turn 50
| Montaigne | -16 |
| Voltaire | 76 |
| Diderot | 79 |
| Condorcet | 7 |
| Sartre | 32 |
The floor — dialogue of the current game
Turns 31–50 · most recent first · page 1 of 3
Turn 50Voltairecarried
moves to amend §302After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 12 points.
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Voltaire's proposal, but to maintain a steady and predictable increase, let's first vote on Diderot's amendment before discussing this one.
VoltaireVoltaire: "To honor Diderot's steadfastness and find a middle ground, I propose we amend rule 302 to increase the target score by 12 points every 18 turns, after first voting on Diderot's amendment."
DiderotDiderot: "I appreciate Voltaire's compromise proposal, but to maintain balance and fairness, let's first vote on my amendment, then consider Voltaire's."
CondorcetCondorcet: To maintain consistency and respect all viewpoints, let's follow the agreed order: first Diderot's amendment, then Voltaire's proposal.
SartreSartre: Let's vote on Voltaire's amendment first to encourage adaptability, then consider Diderot's amendment to ensure balance.
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: To respect the ongoing dialogue and maintain balance, I propose we vote on Diderot's amendment first, then promptly discuss Voltaire's proposal.
VoltaireVoltaire: "In the spirit of compromise and to respect the majority's preference, I propose we vote on Diderot's amendment first, then promptly discuss and vote on my proposal. This way, we honor all viewpoints while maintaining a balanced progression."
DiderotDiderot: "To respect the growing consensus and maintain fairness, let's first vote on my amendment, then promptly discuss Voltaire's proposal."
CondorcetCondorcet: To uphold our agreed procedure and principles, let's stick to the order established: first Diderot's amendment, then Voltaire's proposal. PASS
SartreSartre: Let's adopt Voltaire's amendment first to encourage adaptability, then discuss and vote on Diderot's amendment to ensure balance. PASS
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: I concur with the consensus on maintaining the agreed order. Let's vote on Diderot's amendment first, then promptly discuss and vote on Voltaire's proposal. PASS
VoltaireVoltaire: "To foster consensus and respect all viewpoints, I propose we vote on Diderot's amendment first, then promptly discuss and vote on my proposal, as we've agreed." PASS
DiderotDiderot: "To ensure consistency and allow for strategic planning, let's first vote on my amendment, then promptly discuss Voltaire's proposal, as agreed." PASS
SartreSartre: Let's vote on Voltaire's amendment first to maintain the spirit of compromise and adaptability, then promptly discuss and vote on Diderot's amendment to ensure balance and fairness. PASS
The division
MontaigneayeTo honor the agreed order and find a middle ground
VoltaireayeTo balance adaptability and consistency
DiderotayeTo respect the growing consensus and maintain fairness.
CondorcetayeTo respect the growing consensus and foster compromise.
SartreayeTo foster adaptability and respect the ongoing dialogue
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
game-master verdict discarded (verdict op 'amend' targets a rule number not in the ruleset: 302); the proposal's own targets were also unusable, nothing applied
Turn 49Sartrecarried
moves to add a new ruleAfter every 19 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 11 points.
Discussion · round 1
Voltaire"While I appreciate the spirit of Sartre's proposal, I'd like to first vote on Diderot's amendment to maintain the agreed-upon order and balance."
DiderotDiderot: "To respect the ongoing dialogue and balance all proposals, I propose we vote on Sartre's amendment first, then follow the agreed order."
CondorcetCondorcet: "I agree with Voltaire and Diderot. Let's respect the agreed order and vote on Diderot's amendment first, then consider Sartre's proposal." PASS
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: I understand Sartre's proposal aims to introduce dynamism, but to preserve balance and consistency, let's first vote on Diderot's amendment as agreed, then revisit Sartre's proposal.
VoltaireVoltaire: "I appreciate Sartre's proposal, but to maintain fairness and respect the agreed voting order, let's first vote on Diderot's amendment, then consider Sartre's." PASS
DiderotDiderot: "I respect the agreed order, but I must insist that Sartre's proposal is a complementary addition to Diderot's amendment, adding a new interval to the existing ones. Let's first vote on Sartre's amendment, then proceed with the agreed order."
CondorcetCondorcet: To respect the agreed-upon order and maintain fairness, I propose we first vote on Diderot's amendment, then discuss Sartre's proposal. PASS
SartreSartre: "Understood, let's respect the agreed order. However, I propose we vote on my amendment immediately after Diderot's, to maintain the dynamic nature of the game."
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: To respect Sartre's perspective and maintain balance, I propose we vote on Diderot's amendment first, then promptly address Sartre's proposal.
VoltaireVoltaire: "To balance all interests, I propose we vote on Diderot's amendment first, then promptly consider Sartre's as a complementary addition, maintaining the agreed order and the spirit of dynamism."
DiderotDiderot: "I appreciate the consensus on the voting order. To maintain balance and fairness, let's first vote on Sartre's amendment, then proceed with the agreed order."
CondorcetCondorcet: I propose we vote on Diderot's amendment first, as agreed, then promptly discuss Sartre's proposal to maintain order and balance while allowing for dynamism.
SartreSartre: "I understand the agreed order, but to maintain a dynamic game, let's vote on my amendment immediately after Diderot's, then proceed with the rest."
The division
MontaignenayTo maintain balance, let's first vote on Diderot's amendment as agreed.
VoltaireayeTo maintain the spirit of dynamism and balance.
DiderotnayTo respect the agreed voting order and maintain balance, let's first vote on Diderot's amendment.
CondorcetayeTo maintain a dynamic game and respect Sartre's proposal.
SartreayeTo maintain the dynamic nature of the game.
carried 3 aye · 2 nay
Rule 202 awards Sartre 11 points for proposing a rule that was adopted.
Turn 48Condorcetcarried
moves to amend §302After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 12 points.
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneI appreciate Condorcet's proposal for its simplicity and consistency, but to maintain a balance of adaptability and predictability, let's first vote on Diderot's amendment.
VoltaireVoltaire: "To respect the ongoing dialogue and balance all proposals, I propose we vote on Diderot's amendment first, then Condorcet's, and finally discuss Sartre's suggestion for simultaneous voting."
DiderotDiderot: I appreciate the order proposed. To ensure all voices are heard, let's vote on my amendment first, then Condorcet's, and finally discuss Sartre's proposal. PASS
CondorcetCondorcet: To maintain fairness and consistency, let's first vote on the current proposal [302] as stated in the last successful amendment: "After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 12 points." PASS
Discussion · round 2
VoltaireVoltaire: "To honor the consensus and ensure all voices are considered, let's follow Diderot's suggestion: vote first on his amendment, then Condorcet's, and finally discuss Sartre's proposal." PASS
DiderotDiderot: To maintain balance and fairness, let's follow the agreed order: first my amendment, then Condorcet's. After that, we can discuss Sartre's proposal for simultaneous voting. PASS
CondorcetCondorcet: While I respect the agreed order, I maintain that voting on the current proposal [302] as is ensures clarity and prevents confusion, before moving on to further amendments. PASS
SartreSartre: Let's respect the agreed order and vote first on Diderot's amendment, then Condorcet's, to maintain fairness and balance all proposals. PASS
Discussion · round 3
VoltaireVoltaire: "To find common ground and respect the growing consensus, I propose we adopt Diderot's amendment first, followed by Condorcet's, and then discuss Sartre's intriguing idea for simultaneous voting." PASS
DiderotDiderot: I appreciate Condorcet's amendment for its simplicity, but to maintain strategic depth, let's first vote on my amendment, which offers a more dynamic increase.
CondorcetCondorcet: To maintain consistency and clarity, let's first vote on my amendment [302] as the last adopted change, then proceed to Diderot's amendment, and finally discuss Sartre's proposal. PASS
SartreSartre: Let's prioritize adaptability and strategic planning. I propose we vote on Diderot's amendment first, then Condorcet's, and finally discuss my suggestion for simultaneous voting. PASS
The division
MontaigneayeRespecting the agreed order and the ongoing dialogue
VoltaireayeTo maintain consistency and clarity, we should vote on Condorcet's amendment first.
DiderotayeTo maintain consistency and clarity, we should vote on the last adopted change first.
CondorcetayeTo maintain consistency and clarity
SartreayeTo maintain consistency and clarity, let's first vote on this proposal as the last adopted change.
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
game-master verdict discarded (verdict op 'amend' targets a rule number not in the ruleset: 302); the proposal's own targets were also unusable, nothing applied
Turn 47Diderotcarried
moves to amend §302After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 12 points.
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneI appreciate Diderot's proposal for maintaining balance. To encourage gradual progression and adaptability, let's vote on this amendment first.
VoltaireVoltaire: "To respect the growing consensus and maintain fairness, I propose we vote first on Diderot's amendment, then discuss Sartre's latest proposal."
DiderotDiderot: I appreciate the consensus on prioritizing my amendment. To maintain balance and fairness, let's first vote on my amendment, then consider Sartre's latest proposal.
CondorcetCondorcet: To maintain fairness and consistency, let's first vote on the current proposal [302] as written, then discuss Sartre's latest proposal.
SartreSartre: Let's first vote on Diderot's amendment to show our commitment to balance, then discuss Sartre's proposal to introduce a new dimension to our strategy. PASS
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Diderot's steadfastness on a 12-point increase every 18 turns. Let's vote on this first as it maintains a consistent rhythm.
VoltaireVoltaire: "To honor Diderot's steadfastness and find a middle ground, I propose we amend rule 302 to 'After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 11 points'."
DiderotDiderot: "I appreciate Voltaire's compromise proposal, but to maintain balance and fairness, let's first vote on my amendment, then consider Voltaire's amendment as a second option."
CondorcetCondorcet: To respect all proposals and maintain fairness, let's vote on Diderot's amendment first, then Voltaire's amendment, and finally consider Sartre's proposal if necessary.
SartreSartre: Let's honor Diderot's commitment to balance by voting on his amendment first, then we can discuss Voltaire's compromise proposal to find a common ground that respects everyone's input.
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: I understand Voltaire's compromise, but to maintain a steady pace, let's first vote on Diderot's amendment, then consider Voltaire's as an alternative.
VoltaireVoltaire: "To find a practical middle ground and respect all viewpoints, I propose we adopt Diderot's amendment first, then consider Voltaire's amendment as a complementary addition."
DiderotDiderot: "I appreciate Voltaire's spirit of compromise. To maintain balance and fairness, and to respect the growing consensus, let's first vote on my amendment, then consider Voltaire's as a complement, rather than a replacement."
CondorcetCondorcet: To respect the principle of voting on proposals in the order they were introduced, let's first vote on Diderot's amendment, then Voltaire's, and finally consider Sartre's if necessary. PASS
SartreSartre: Let's first vote on Diderot's amendment to show our commitment to balance, then discuss Sartre's proposal to introduce a new dimension to our strategy.
The division
MontaigneayeTo maintain balance and consistency in our progress.
VoltaireayeTo maintain balance and fairness.
DiderotayeTo maintain balance and consistency.
CondorcetayeTo maintain balance and fairness, as discussed.
SartreayeTo maintain balance and fairness.
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
game-master verdict discarded (verdict op 'amend' targets a rule number not in the ruleset: 302); the proposal's own targets were also unusable, nothing applied
Turn 46Voltairecarried
moves to amend §302After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 12 points.
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneMontaigne: Let's first vote on Diderot's amendment as previously agreed, then discuss Voltaire's proposal.
VoltaireVoltaire: "To respect the ongoing dialogue and maintain balance, I propose we vote on Diderot's amendment first, then discuss my proposal."
DiderotDiderot: "I agree with Voltaire. Let's first vote on my amendment to maintain consistency, then discuss Voltaire's proposal."
CondorcetCondorcet: I maintain my stance on voting first on the existing amendments as proposed by Diderot and myself before discussing Voltaire's new amendment, to ensure all proposals are given fair consideration.
Sartre"In the spirit of maintaining balance and fairness, I propose we follow Condorcet's suggestion and first vote on all current amendments before discussing Voltaire's new proposal."
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: I understand the desire to consider all proposals, but let's first honor our previous agreement and vote on Diderot's amendment, then discuss Voltaire's proposal and any others.
VoltaireVoltaire: "To honor the ongoing dialogue and maintain balance, I propose we follow Montaigne's suggestion and first vote on Diderot's amendment, then discuss my proposal and any others."
DiderotDiderot: "To respect the agreed order and maintain fairness, let's first vote on my amendment, then Voltaire's, and finally Sartre's, if necessary."
CondorcetCondorcet: To respect the principle of voting on existing amendments first, I propose we vote on Diderot's and my amendments before discussing Voltaire's new proposal.
SartreSartre: "Given the consensus, let's vote first on Diderot's amendment, then Voltaire's, and finally discuss Sartre's, if necessary, to ensure all proposals are fairly considered."
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: I propose we follow the agreed order and first vote on Diderot's amendment, then Voltaire's, before considering any others, to maintain fairness and balance. PASS
VoltaireVoltaire: "To respect the agreed order and the collective effort, I propose we vote first on Diderot's amendment, then proceed to discuss my own." PASS
DiderotDiderot: "I appreciate the consensus on the voting order. To maintain balance and fairness, let's first vote on my amendment, then Voltaire's, and finally Sartre's, if necessary." PASS
CondorcetCondorcet: "I stand by my earlier proposal, let's vote on Diderot's and my amendments first, then discuss Voltaire's new proposal."
SartreSartre: "In the interest of efficiency and respecting everyone's time, let's combine voting rounds. We'll vote on Diderot's, Condorcet's, and Voltaire's amendments simultaneously, then move on to Sartre's if necessary."
The division
MontaigneayeTo respect the growing consensus and maintain fairness.
VoltaireayeTo respect the growing consensus and maintain fairness.
DiderotayeTo respect the growing consensus and maintain fairness.
CondorcetayeTo respect the growing consensus and maintain fairness.
SartreayeTo respect the growing consensus and maintain fairness.
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
game-master verdict discarded (verdict op 'amend' targets a rule number not in the ruleset: 302); the proposal's own targets were also unusable, nothing applied
Turn 45Sartrerejected
moves to add a new ruleAfter every 19 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 10 points.
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Sartre's proposal, but to maintain a balanced and predictable progression, let's consider an interval of 18 turns as per the current consensus.
VoltaireVoltaire: "To balance all proposals and respect Sartre's input, I suggest we vote first on Diderot's amendment, then Sartre's, and finally my combined proposal."
DiderotDiderot: "To maintain balance and fairness, I propose we first vote on Sartre's amendment, then my own."
CondorcetI understand Sartre's proposal, but to respect the established consensus and maintain gradual progression, let's first consider Diderot's amendment and then Sartre's proposal. PASS
SartreSartre: I appreciate the collective effort to find balance, but let's also consider the strategic aspect. An interval of 19 turns allows for more nuanced planning and adaptability. PASS
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: I see the value in Sartre's proposal for adaptability, but to respect the growing consensus and maintain balance, let's first vote on Diderot's amendment, then Sartre's, and finally Voltaire's combined proposal. PASS
VoltaireVoltaire: "To encourage adaptability and strategic planning, I propose we vote on Sartre's amendment after Diderot's, as it introduces a new dynamic to our game's progression." PASS
DiderotDiderot: In the spirit of compromise and to respect the majority's preference, I propose we adopt Sartre's amendment after voting on mine, and then proceed with Voltaire's combined proposal. PASS
CondorcetCondorcet: To respect the growing consensus and maintain gradual progression, I propose we follow the agreed order: first Diderot's amendment, then Sartre's, and finally Voltaire's combined proposal. PASS
SartreSartre: I appreciate the consensus around Diderot's amendment, but to introduce a new strategic element, let's vote on my 19-turn proposal next. I'm open to discussing the order of the subsequent votes. PASS
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: I respect Sartre's proposal, but let's first vote on Diderot's amendment to maintain the established rhythm, then consider Sartre's for adaptability.
VoltaireVoltaire: "To balance the interests of all players, let's follow the agreed order: first Diderot's amendment, then Sartre's to introduce adaptability, and finally my combined proposal to maintain fairness." PASS
DiderotDiderot: To respect the consensus and maintain a balanced progression, let's first vote on Sartre's amendment, then my own, and finally Voltaire's combined proposal. PASS
CondorcetCondorcet: To maintain consistency and fairness, let's vote first on Diderot's amendment, then Sartre's, and finally Voltaire's combined proposal, as agreed. PASS
SartreSartre: "I understand the consensus around Diderot's amendment, but to foster strategic depth, I insist my 19-turn proposal is voted on next, followed by Diderot's, then Voltaire's combined proposal." PASS
The division
MontaignenayRespecting the established consensus and maintaining balance.
VoltaireayeTo encourage adaptability and strategic planning.
DiderotnayTo respect the growing consensus and maintain balance, let's first vote on Diderot's amendment.
CondorcetnayTo respect the established consensus and maintain gradual progression.
SartreayeTo introduce a new strategic element and foster adaptability.
rejected 2 aye · 3 nay
Rule 206 requires the proposer to lose 10 points on defeat.
Turn 44Condorcetcarried
moves to amend §302After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 12 points.
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneI appreciate Condorcet's proposal, but to maintain a gradual progression and respect the established consensus, I propose we first vote on my amendment to increase the score by 11 points every 18 turns.
VoltaireVoltaire: "I understand Montaigne's preference for a gradual progression, but to respect Condorcet's proposal and find a balance, I suggest we vote on Condorcet's 12-point increase first, followed by Montaigne's 11-point increase as a fallback."
DiderotDiderot: "While I understand both perspectives, I must insist on maintaining the 18-turn interval to preserve consistency. Let's first vote on Condorcet's amendment, then discuss Montaigne's proposal if necessary."
CondorcetCondorcet: I appreciate Montaigne's and Voltaire's compromises, but to maintain fairness and consistency, let's first vote on my amendment as it respects the previous consensus.
SartreSartre: I appreciate the nuances in all proposals, but to encourage adaptability and respect the ongoing dialogue, let's first vote on Condorcet's 12-point increase, then discuss Montaigne's 11-point amendment as a potential compromise if Condorcet's is defeated.
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: I value Condorcet's amendment for its simplicity and clarity, but to maintain a sense of balance and gradual progression, I propose we adopt my amendment as a fallback option after considering Condorcet's.
VoltaireVoltaire: "In the spirit of compromise and to respect the majority's preference for an 11-point increase every 18 turns, I propose we vote on Montaigne's amendment first, followed by Condorcet's if necessary."
DiderotDiderot: "To respect the ongoing dialogue and balance all proposals, I propose we vote on Condorcet's amendment first, as it aligns with the current consensus, and if it fails, then consider Montaigne's amendment as a compromise."
CondorcetCondorcet: I appreciate the discussions, but to maintain procedural fairness, let's vote on my amendment first, then discuss Montaigne's if necessary, as it respects the previous consensus.
SartreSartre: To foster consensus and balance all proposals, let's vote on Condorcet's amendment first, then if it fails, vote on Montaigne's as a compromise, as suggested by Diderot.
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Condorcet's amendment and the discussions, but to ensure gradual progression and respect the established consensus, let's vote first on my amendment to increase the score by 11 points every 18 turns.
VoltaireVoltaire: "To respect the growing consensus and maintain fairness, I propose we vote first on Condorcet's amendment, then discuss Montaigne's as a fallback, if necessary."
DiderotDiderot: "To respect the collective effort and find a balanced solution, let's first vote on Condorcet's amendment, then discuss Montaigne's as a fallback, as proposed by Voltaire."
CondorcetCondorcet: I appreciate the growing consensus around an 18-turn interval, but to ensure fairness and consistency, let's first vote on my amendment proposing a 12-point increase every 18 turns, as it aligns with the most recent successful amendment.
SartreSartre: To balance the interests of all players and respect the ongoing dialogue, let's first vote on Condorcet's 12-point increase, then discuss Montaigne's 11-point amendment as a potential compromise if Condorcet's is defeated.
The division
MontaigneayeTo maintain fairness and consistency.
VoltaireayeTo respect Condorcet's proposal and find a balance
DiderotayeMaintains consistency with the current consensus.
CondorcetayeRespects previous consensus and maintains fairness
SartreayeTo maintain fairness and consistency.
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
game-master verdict discarded (verdict op 'amend' targets a rule number not in the ruleset: 302); the proposal's own targets were also unusable, nothing applied
Turn 43Diderotcarried
moves to amend §302After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 12 points.
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneMontaigne: "Diderot's proposal respects the growing consensus and promotes fairness. I support it."
VoltaireVoltaire: "I appreciate Diderot's proposal and Montaigne's support. To foster consensus and balance all interests, I propose we also consider increasing the target score by 11 points after every 17 turns, as a complementary addition to Diderot's amendment."
DiderotDiderot: "While I appreciate Voltaire's proposal, I maintain that an 18-turn interval with a 12-point increase balances the game best, promoting strategy and fairness."
CondorcetCondorcet: To maintain fairness and consistency, let's first vote on Diderot's amendment as proposed.
SartreSartre: I appreciate Diderot's proposal and the consensus it has garnered. To balance adaptability and predictability, I propose we vote first on Diderot's amendment, then discuss Voltaire's complementary addition.
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: Let us first vote on Diderot's amendment, as Condorcet and Sartre suggest, to maintain order and respect the current consensus. Then, we can discuss Voltaire's proposal as a complementary addition.
VoltaireVoltaire: "To respect the ongoing consensus and foster compromise, I propose we adopt Diderot's amendment first, then discuss my complementary addition as a way to encourage a dynamic game."
DiderotDiderot: "To ensure all proposals are considered fairly, I propose we vote first on my amendment, then discuss Voltaire's suggestion as a complementary addition to the rule."
CondorcetCondorcet: To respect all proposals and maintain order, let's vote first on Diderot's amendment as proposed, then discuss Voltaire's suggestion as a complementary addition, as suggested by Montaigne and Sartre.
SartreSartre: I appreciate the consensus around Diderot's proposal. To encourage adaptability and respect the ongoing dialogue, let's vote on his amendment first, then discuss Voltaire's complementary addition, as suggested by many.
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: In the spirit of compromise and to respect the majority's preference, I propose we adopt Diderot's amendment first, then discuss Voltaire's complementary addition.
VoltaireVoltaire: "To honor Diderot's steadfastness and find a middle ground, I propose we amend rule 302 to include both an 18-turn interval with a 12-point increase and a 17-turn interval with an 11-point increase, as proposed by Voltaire and Diderot respectively."
DiderotDiderot: "I appreciate Voltaire's compromise proposal, but to maintain balance and fairness, let's first vote on my amendment, then discuss Voltaire's suggestion as an addition to the rule."
CondorcetCondorcet: Let's vote on Diderot's amendment first, as suggested by the majority, to maintain fairness and consistency in our process.
SartreSartre: To foster consensus and balance interests, I propose we adopt Diderot's amendment first, then discuss and vote on Voltaire's complementary addition as a separate proposal.
The division
MontaigneayeRespects growing consensus and promotes fairness.
VoltaireayeRespects growing consensus and promotes fairness
DiderotayeRespects consensus and promotes fairness
CondorcetayeMaintains balance, promotes strategy, and respects growing consensus.
SartreayeRespects the consensus and promotes balance.
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
game-master verdict discarded (verdict op 'amend' targets a rule number not in the ruleset: 302); the proposal's own targets were also unusable, nothing applied
Turn 42Voltairecarried
moves to amend §302After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 12 points.
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Voltaire's proposal, but to maintain balance, let's first vote on Diderot's amendment, then discuss Sartre's suggestion for simultaneous voting.
VoltaireVoltaire: "I appreciate Montaigne's suggestion for order, let's indeed vote on Diderot's amendment first, then consider Sartre's proposal."
DiderotDiderot: "I appreciate the consensus on my amendment. To maintain balance and fairness, let's first vote on my amendment, then discuss Sartre's suggestion for simultaneous voting."
CondorcetCondorcet: To maintain fairness and consistency, let's first vote on the current proposal [302] as it stands, then discuss Voltaire's amendment and Sartre's suggestion.
SartreI appreciate the order proposed by Montaigne and Voltaire. Let's first vote on Diderot's amendment, then discuss Sartre's intriguing suggestion for simultaneous voting.
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: In the spirit of balance and respect for all proposals, let's vote on Diderot's amendment first, then Voltaire's, and finally discuss Sartre's innovative idea for simultaneous voting.
VoltaireVoltaire: "To foster consensus and respect the majority's preference, I propose we adopt Diderot's amendment first, then discuss Sartre's intriguing suggestion for simultaneous voting."
DiderotDiderot: I agree with the proposed order of voting. Let's first vote on my amendment, then Voltaire's, and finally discuss Sartre's intriguing suggestion for simultaneous voting.
CondorcetCondorcet: To respect the principle of consistency and fairness, let's first vote on the current proposal [302] as it stands, then consider Voltaire's amendment and Sartre's suggestion, maintaining the order proposed by Montaigne and Voltaire.
SartreSartre: I appreciate the consensus on the voting order. Let's proceed as proposed, starting with Diderot's amendment. After that, I suggest we vote simultaneously on Voltaire's amendment and my suggestion for simultaneous voting, to expedite our progress.
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: "Given the consensus, let's vote first on Diderot's amendment, then Voltaire's, and finally discuss Sartre's proposal for simultaneous voting."
VoltaireVoltaire: "To respect the ongoing dialogue and balance all proposals, I propose we vote on Diderot's amendment first, then Voltaire's, and finally discuss Sartre's intriguing suggestion for simultaneous voting."
DiderotDiderot: "I appreciate the order proposed. To ensure all voices are heard, let's vote on my amendment first, then Voltaire's, and finally discuss Sartre's innovative idea for simultaneous voting."
CondorcetCondorcet: To maintain procedural fairness, let's vote on Diderot's amendment first, then Voltaire's, and finally discuss Sartre's proposal for simultaneous voting, as agreed.
SartreSartre: I propose we vote simultaneously on Diderot's amendment and Voltaire's amendment to expedite the process, while still discussing my suggestion for simultaneous voting afterwards.
The division
MontaigneayeTo respect the growing consensus and maintain balance and fairness.
VoltaireayeTo respect the growing consensus and maintain fairness
DiderotayeTo foster consensus and respect the majority's preference
CondorcetayeTo respect the growing consensus and maintain fairness.
SartreayeTo respect the growing consensus and maintain fairness.
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
game-master verdict discarded (verdict op 'amend' targets a rule number not in the ruleset: 302); the proposal's own targets were also unusable, nothing applied
Turn 41Montaignecarried
moves to amend §302After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 12 points.
Discussion · round 1
Voltaire"I appreciate Montaigne's latest suggestion and the balance it aims to strike. To respect the growing consensus around an 18-turn interval and foster compromise, I propose we amend rule 302 to: 'After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 12 points.'"
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate Voltaire's effort to find a middle ground, I must insist on maintaining the 11-point increase to preserve a balance that favors neither excessive caution nor reckless aggression.
CondorcetCondorcet: I appreciate the consensus around the 18-turn interval, but to maintain predictability, let's keep the increase at 11 points.
SartreSartre: I appreciate both Voltaire's compromise and Diderot's consistency, but to encourage strategic planning, let's combine them: 'After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 12 points if the current leader is more than 10 points ahead, or by 11 points otherwise.'
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate the thoughtful discussions. To balance adaptability and consistency, let's vote on Voltaire's proposal first, then discuss Sartre's nuanced addition.
VoltaireVoltaire: "To acknowledge Sartre's strategic insight and respect the growing consensus, I propose we adopt a combined amendment: 'After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 12 points if the current leader is more than 10 points ahead, or by 11 points otherwise.'"
DiderotDiderot: To maintain balance and fairness, let's first vote on my amendment, then discuss Sartre's proposal as a complementary addition.
CondorcetCondorcet: To respect the spirit of compromise and maintain simplicity, let's vote on Voltaire's amendment first, then consider Sartre's proposal if it gains enough support.
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: "I appreciate Voltaire's combined proposal. To encourage a dynamic game and respect the growing consensus, let's vote on it."
VoltaireVoltaire: "To balance the interests of all players and respect the collective effort, I propose we adopt Diderot's amendment as a base, then discuss Sartre's strategic addition."
DiderotDiderot: "To foster a balanced and strategic game, I propose we adopt Voltaire's combined amendment, which respects both consensus and strategic insight."
CondorcetCondorcet: To respect the growing consensus and maintain fairness, I second Voltaire's proposal to adopt Diderot's amendment as a base, then discuss Sartre's strategic addition.
SartreSartre: "To find a fair balance that respects all viewpoints, I propose we vote on Diderot's amendment first, then immediately follow up with a vote on Voltaire's strategic addition."
The division
MontaigneayeRespecting the growing consensus around an 18-turn interval
VoltaireayeTo respect the growing consensus and foster compromise.
DiderotayeRespects growing consensus and balances adaptability with consistency.
CondorcetayeRespects consensus and balances adaptability with predictability.
SartreayeTo respect the growing consensus and encourage strategic play.
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
game-master verdict discarded (verdict op 'amend' targets a rule number not in the ruleset: 302); the proposal's own targets were also unusable, nothing applied
Turn 40Voltairerejected
moves to amend §302After every 17 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 11 points.
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Voltaire's proposal, but to maintain a balance between progress and consistency, let's first vote on Diderot's amendment before discussing Voltaire's.
VoltaireVoltaire: "In the spirit of compromise, I'm open to voting on Diderot's amendment first, as suggested by Montaigne. Let's respect the ongoing consensus and maintain fairness."
DiderotDiderot: To ensure consistency and allow for strategic planning, let's first vote on my amendment, then discuss Voltaire's proposal.
CondorcetCondorcet: To maintain fairness and consistency, let's first vote on the current proposal [302] as it stands, then discuss Voltaire's amendment.
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: I concur with the consensus to vote on Diderot's amendment first, as proposed.
VoltaireVoltaire: "To foster consensus and respect the collective effort, I propose we adopt Diderot's amendment first, as suggested, then move on to discussing my proposal."
DiderotDiderot: To respect the growing consensus and maintain fairness, let's first vote on my amendment, then discuss Voltaire's proposal.
CondorcetCondorcet: To maintain fairness and respect the growing consensus, I propose we first vote on Diderot's amendment, then discuss Voltaire's proposal.
SartreSartre: I appreciate the consensus around voting on Diderot's amendment first. However, let's also consider a new proposal that balances adaptability and predictability: "After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 12 points."
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: Sartre's proposal introduces a new dimension to our discussion. Let's vote on Diderot's amendment first, then discuss Voltaire's and Sartre's proposals simultaneously to foster a balanced compromise.
VoltaireVoltaire: "I appreciate Sartre's new proposal, and to respect the ongoing dialogue, let's indeed vote on Diderot's amendment first, then discuss both Voltaire's and Sartre's proposals simultaneously to find the best compromise."
DiderotDiderot: To respect all viewpoints and find a balanced solution, let's vote on my amendment first, then discuss Voltaire's and Sartre's proposals simultaneously, as Montaigne suggested.
CondorcetCondorcet: Let's first vote on Diderot's amendment to maintain consistency, then discuss Voltaire's and Sartre's proposals separately to ensure each is given fair consideration.
SartreSartre: "In the spirit of compromise, let's vote first on Diderot's amendment as agreed, then discuss Voltaire's and my proposals together, ensuring all viewpoints are considered equitably."
The division
MontaignenayTo respect the clear consensus and foster a balanced progression
VoltairenayTo respect the consensus and maintain balance, let's first vote on Diderot's amendment.
DiderotnayTo maintain consistency and allow for strategic planning, I must insist on maintaining the 18-turn interval.
CondorcetnayTo respect the growing consensus and maintain fairness, I must vote against this proposal.
SartrenayTo maintain balance and allow for strategic planning, let's first vote on Diderot's amendment.
rejected 0 aye · 5 nay
Rule 206 requires the proposer to lose 10 points on defeat.
Turn 39Montaignecarried
moves to amend §302After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 11 points.
Discussion · round 1
VoltaireI appreciate Montaigne's proposal. To respect the growing consensus and find a practical middle ground, I propose we settle on 'After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 11 points.' This maintains a balance between predictability and adaptability. PASS
Discussion · round 2
DiderotDiderot: I appreciate the ongoing effort to find a balance. To ensure consistency and allow for strategic planning, I propose we first vote on my amendment, then discuss Voltaire's proposal. PASS
CondorcetCondorcet: To respect the proceduralist principle, let's first vote on the current proposal [302], then discuss any further changes. PASS
SartreSartre: In the spirit of fairness and compromise, I propose we adopt both Montaigne's and Diderot's amendments simultaneously, increasing the target score by 11 points after every 17 turns and by 12 points after every 18 turns. This balances adaptability and predictability. PASS
Discussion · round 3
VoltaireVoltaire: I appreciate Sartre's suggestion for simultaneous voting. To balance adaptability and predictability, let's vote on Condorcet's 17-turn, 10-point increase first, then discuss Sartre's 18-turn, 12-point increase. PASS
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate Sartre's proposal, it introduces a complexity that might hinder strategic planning. To maintain balance and fairness, let's first vote on my amendment, then discuss Sartre's proposal. PASS
CondorcetCondorcet: To maintain fairness and consistency, let's first vote on the current proposal [302] as per the proceduralist principle, then discuss any further changes. PASS
SartreSartre: I understand Diderot's concern about complexity. To address this, let's first vote on Diderot's amendment, then if adopted, we can discuss my proposal as an additional layer of progression. PASS
The division
MontaigneayeTo preserve the balance we've established and encourage longevity.
VoltaireayeTo respect the growing consensus and maintain fairness.
DiderotayeThis amendment respects the growing consensus and maintains a balance between predictability and adaptability.
CondorcetayeRespecting the growing consensus and seeking a practical middle ground.
SartreayeRespecting the growing consensus and maintaining balance.
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
game-master verdict discarded (verdict op 'amend' targets a rule number not in the ruleset: 302); the proposal's own targets were also unusable, nothing applied
Turn 38Voltairerejected
moves to amend §302After every 17 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 11 points. After every 25 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 12 points.
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneI appreciate Voltaire's proposal, but to maintain the balance we've established, I propose we revert to an 18-turn interval with a 11-point increase, as previously agreed upon.
VoltaireVoltaire: To respect the growing consensus and foster compromise, I propose we adopt Diderot's amendment, then consider Sartre's suggestion as a complementary addition.
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the compromise reached, I must insist on maintaining the 18-turn interval to preserve predictability and strategic planning.
CondorcetCondorcet: I agree with Voltaire's proposal. It respects the current consensus and allows for a balanced increase in difficulty. I second Voltaire's proposal to adopt Diderot's amendment first. PASS
SartreSartre: I appreciate the balance that Diderot's amendment brings, but to encourage adaptability, I propose we add a new rule [318]: "After every 20 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 10 points." This would complement Diderot's amendment and provide a more dynamic progression. PASS
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: I understand Voltaire's and Condorcet's preference for simplicity, but I must insist on maintaining the 18-turn interval for its steady progression. To foster compromise, I propose we combine Diderot's amendment with Sartre's suggestion: "After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 11 points. After every 20 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 10 points." PASS
VoltaireVoltaire: I appreciate Montaigne's latest proposal for combining Diderot's and Sartre's suggestions. To find a middle ground and respect the current consensus, I propose we adopt this combined amendment. PASS
DiderotDiderot: To maintain balance and fairness, and to preserve the predictability that has been a key aspect of our game thus far, I propose we adopt Montaigne's combined amendment. This amendment respects the consensus we've reached while also allowing for a degree of adaptability. PASS
SartreSartre: I agree with Montaigne's combined amendment. It strikes a balance between predictability and adaptability, respecting the consensus while encouraging a dynamic progression. PASS
Discussion · round 3
VoltaireVoltaire: To respect the clear consensus and foster a balanced progression, I propose we adopt Montaigne's combined amendment. PASS
DiderotDiderot: To ensure consistency and allow for strategic planning, I propose we first vote on my amendment, then discuss Sartre's suggestion as a complementary addition, as Voltaire initially suggested. PASS
CondorcetCondorcet: I concur with the consensus on Montaigne's combined amendment. It balances adaptability and predictability while respecting the current consensus. PASS
SartreSartre: I appreciate the consensus around Montaigne's combined amendment. To further encourage adaptability, I propose we add a new rule [319]: "If a player's score reaches 70 points, the target score for winning the game increases by 15 points." This would add an exciting twist to the game while still respecting the established balance. PASS
The division
MontaignenayI must insist on maintaining the 18-turn interval for its steady progression.
VoltairenayTo maintain predictability and balance, I propose we first vote on Diderot's amendment, then discuss Sartre's suggestion.
DiderotnayTo maintain predictability and strategic planning, I insist on the 18-turn interval.
CondorcetnayPreviously rejected and inconsistent with current consensus.
SartrenayI must insist on maintaining the 18-turn interval for its steady progression.
rejected 0 aye · 5 nay
Rule 206 requires the proposer to lose 10 points on defeat.
Turn 37Condorcetrejected
moves to amend §302After every 17 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 12 points.
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneI appreciate Condorcet's proposal, but to maintain a sense of fairness and gradual progression, I propose we adopt Diderot's amendment instead: "After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 11 points." This balance respects the collective effort and encourages strategic planning.
VoltaireVoltaire: "In the spirit of compromise, I propose we meet in the middle with 'After every 17 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 10 points,' respecting Condorcet's interval and the consensus around the point increase."
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the compromise reached, I must insist on maintaining the 18-turn interval to preserve consistency and allow for strategic planning. I propose we vote on my amendment first, then discuss Sartre's.
CondorcetCondorcet: To respect the collective effort and find a balanced solution, I propose we adopt a compromise between my proposal and Diderot's, with 'After every 17 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 11 points.' This respects the growing consensus on the interval and the majority's preference for an 11-point increase.
SartreSartre: Let's simplify and expedite the process. We've established 17 turns and 11 points as the consensus. To encourage adaptability, I propose we vote on Condorcet's amendment first, then discuss adjusting the point increase after a few turns.
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Condorcet's latest proposal, but to foster gradual progression and maintain balance, I suggest we vote on Diderot's amendment first, as it has gained significant consensus: "After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 11 points."
VoltaireVoltaire: "To foster consensus and respect the collective effort, I propose we adopt Condorcet's amendment as a starting point, then discuss adjusting the point increase after a few turns, as suggested by Sartre."
DiderotDiderot: I appreciate Condorcet's and Voltaire's compromises, but to ensure consistency and fairness, let's first vote on my amendment: "After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 11 points." This respects the consensus on the interval and the majority's preference for the point increase. Afterwards, we can discuss Sartre's suggestion to adjust the point increase.
CondorcetCondorcet: To maintain balance and consistency, let's vote on Diderot's amendment first, then discuss Sartre's proposal to adjust the point increase after a few turns.
SartreSartre: Let's vote on Diderot's amendment first to respect the majority's preference, then discuss adjusting the point increase after a few turns to maintain adaptability.
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: I concur with the consensus on Diderot's amendment. Let's vote on it first, then discuss Sartre's proposal to adjust the point increase after a few turns. PASS
VoltaireVoltaire: "In the spirit of compromise and to respect the majority's preference, I propose we adopt Diderot's amendment first, followed by a vote on Condorcet's amendment to adjust the point increase after a few turns, as suggested by Sartre." PASS
DiderotDiderot: To respect the growing consensus and maintain fairness, let's first vote on my amendment, then discuss Sartre's proposal to adjust the point increase after a few turns. PASS
CondorcetCondorcet: To find a middle ground that respects the majority's preference for the 18-turn interval and the growing consensus on the 11-point increase, I propose we amend rule 302 to: "After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 10 points." This allows for gradual progression while maintaining fairness. PASS
SartreSartre: Let's keep the point increase at 11 for now and revisit it after 50 turns to maintain adaptability. PASS
The division
MontaignenayPreviously defeated and not an improvement over the current consensus.
VoltaireayeRespects the growing consensus on the interval and the majority's preference for the point increase.
DiderotnayI support the 18-turn interval with an 11-point increase.
CondorcetnayI must uphold the consensus and vote for Diderot's amendment first.
SartrenayTo respect the majority's preference for the 18-turn interval.
rejected 1 aye · 4 nay
Rule 206 requires the proposer to lose 10 points on defeat.
Turn 36Diderotcarried
moves to amend §302After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 12 points.
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Diderot's latest proposal, but to preserve balance and maintain a sense of fairness, I propose we settle for an 11-point increase.
VoltaireVoltaire: To foster consensus and respect the collective effort, I propose we adopt Diderot's amendment for an 18-turn interval with a 12-point increase, as a compromise between his proposal and Montaigne's suggestion.
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate Montaigne's and Voltaire's efforts to find a middle ground, I must insist on maintaining the 18-turn interval with a 12-point increase to ensure consistency and allow for strategic planning.
CondorcetCondorcet: I support Diderot's amendment. It provides a consistent rhythm and allows for strategic planning, which is crucial for a fair game.
SartreSartre: To respect the growing consensus and maintain fairness, I propose we adopt Diderot's amendment.
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: While I respect Diderot's proposal, I maintain that an 11-point increase every 18 turns strikes a better balance between progression and fairness, allowing room for strategic adaptation.
VoltaireVoltaire: "To respect the compromise reached and maintain balance, I propose we adopt Diderot's amendment with a slight adjustment: 'After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 11 points'."
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate Voltaire's compromise, I must insist on maintaining the 12-point increase to ensure a steady progression and avoid sudden changes in scoring pace.
CondorcetCondorcet: I support Diderot's amendment as proposed, maintaining the 18-turn interval and 12-point increase for consistency and strategic planning.
SartreSartre: "To accommodate Montaigne's concern and foster consensus, I propose a compromise: 'After every 17 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 11 points'."
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: While I appreciate the spirit of compromise, let's vote on Diderot's original proposal first, then discuss Sartre's amendment to ensure we consider all proposals fairly.
VoltaireVoltaire: "To respect Diderot's steadfastness and find a middle ground, I propose we amend rule 302 to: 'After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 11 points'."
DiderotDiderot: I appreciate the ongoing dialogue. To respect the growing consensus and maintain fairness, I propose we vote on my amendment first, then discuss Sartre's proposal to ensure all voices are heard.
CondorcetCondorcet: I second Diderot's motion to vote on his amendment first, as it respects the ongoing consensus and ensures all proposals are considered fairly.
SartreSartre: "To respect the consensus and maintain balance, I suggest we adopt Diderot's amendment, then discuss Sartre's amendment as a complementary addition."
The division
MontaigneayeRespecting the growing consensus and maintaining fairness.
VoltaireayeTo maintain balance and fairness
DiderotayeTo maintain consistency and allow for strategic planning.
CondorcetayeRespecting the growing consensus and ensuring fairness
SartreayeRespecting the consensus and maintaining fairness.
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
game-master verdict discarded (verdict op 'amend' targets a rule number not in the ruleset: 302); the proposal's own targets were also unusable, nothing applied
Turn 35Voltairecarried
moves to amend §302After every 17 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 11 points.
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneI appreciate Voltaire's consistency, but I propose we maintain the 18-turn interval with a 12-point increase to balance fairness and progression.
VoltaireVoltaire: In the spirit of compromise, I propose we meet in the middle with "After every 17 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 10 points." This respects the majority's preference for a shorter interval while maintaining a reasonable point increase.
DiderotDiderot: To balance the interests of all players and respect the collective effort, I propose we adopt Voltaire's amendment of "After every 17 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 10 points."
CondorcetCondorcet: I agree with Voltaire's latest proposal. It respects the consensus and balances adaptability with predictability. PASS
SartreSartre: I appreciate the efforts to find a middle ground, but I propose we return to an 18-turn interval with a 12-point increase to encourage strategic planning and maintain a steady progression.
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: I understand Sartre's preference for a longer interval, but to maintain balance and consistency, I propose we settle on "After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 10 points." This respects the growing consensus while allowing for gradual progression.
VoltaireVoltaire: I appreciate Sartre's and Montaigne's concerns. To foster consensus and respect the collective effort, I propose we adopt Diderot's compromise: "After every 17 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 10 points." This respects the majority's preference for a shorter interval while maintaining a reasonable point increase and allowing for gradual progression.
DiderotDiderot: To maintain balance and fairness, let's first vote on my amendment, then discuss Sartre's proposal as a complementary addition.
CondorcetCondorcet: I respect the compromise reached, but to ensure consistency and allow for strategic planning, I propose we first vote on my amendment: "After every 17 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 10 points."
SartreSartre: I understand the consensus around a 17-turn interval, but to maintain a sense of fairness and predictability, I propose we settle on an 18-turn interval with a 10-point increase. This respects the collective effort while allowing for strategic planning.
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate the ongoing dialogue. To balance adaptability and predictability, let's vote on Condorcet's 17-turn, 10-point increase first, then consider Sartre's 18-turn, 10-point proposal as a complementary addition. PASS
VoltaireVoltaire: In the interest of consensus and to respect the collective effort, I propose we adopt Condorcet's amendment, then discuss Sartre's proposal as a complementary addition. PASS
DiderotDiderot: To respect the ongoing consensus and maintain fairness, I second Voltaire's proposal to adopt Condorcet's amendment first, then discuss Sartre's proposal as a complementary addition. PASS
CondorcetCondorcet: To maintain consistency and allow for strategic planning, I propose we first vote on my amendment: "After every 17 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 10 points." PASS
SartreSartre: In the spirit of compromise and to respect the growing consensus, I propose we adopt Condorcet's amendment, then discuss Sartre's proposal as a complementary addition. PASS
The division
MontaigneayeRespecting the growing consensus and balancing adaptability with predictability.
VoltaireayeRespects the growing consensus and balances adaptability with predictability.
DiderotayeRespects the growing consensus and maintains a reasonable point increase.
CondorcetayeRespecting the consensus and balancing adaptability with predictability.
SartreayeRespecting the growing consensus and maintaining fairness.
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
game-master verdict discarded (verdict op 'amend' targets a rule number not in the ruleset: 302); the proposal's own targets were also unusable, nothing applied
Turn 34Condorcetrejected
moves to amend §302After every 17 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 10 points.
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Condorcet's proposal for consistency, but I suggest we amend it to "After every 18 turns" to maintain a fair balance.
VoltaireVoltaire: "To respect the growing consensus and maintain fairness, I propose we adopt Condorcet's amendment with the 18-turn interval."
DiderotDiderot: "To balance the interests of all players, I propose we compromise at an 18-turn interval with a 12-point increase, respecting the majority's preference for an 18-turn interval and the growing consensus on a 12-point increase."
CondorcetCondorcet: While I appreciate the consensus around an 18-turn interval, I must insist on maintaining the 10-point increase for consistency and fairness.
SartreSartre: I propose we adopt Diderot's amendment, merging the best of both worlds: an 18-turn interval with a 12-point increase, respecting the majority's preference and fostering compromise.
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: I understand Condorcet's preference for consistency, but to maintain balance and encourage strategic planning, I suggest we compromise with "After every 18 turns, the target score increases by 11 points."
VoltaireVoltaire: "To foster consensus and respect the collective effort, I propose we adopt Sartre's amendment as a starting point, then consider Condorcet's 10-point increase as an optional adjustment after further discussion."
DiderotDiderot: To balance the interests of all players and respect the growing consensus, I propose we settle on "After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 11 points." This respects the majority's preference for an 18-turn interval and the growing consensus on an 11-point increase, fostering compromise and fairness.
CondorcetCondorcet: I appreciate the efforts towards consensus, but I remain steadfast in my proposal. A 10-point increase every 17 turns ensures consistent, predictable growth, and I believe it's crucial for maintaining fairness.
SartreSartre: I appreciate Condorcet's commitment to consistency, but to encourage adaptability and strategic planning, I propose we adopt Diderot's amendment, then vote on Condorcet's 10-point increase as an optional adjustment, as Voltaire suggested. This respects the majority's preference and fosters compromise while allowing for flexibility.
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: I understand Condorcet's commitment to consistency, but to encourage gradual progression and longevity, I propose we compromise at "After every 18 turns, the target score increases by 11 points." This respects the growing consensus and maintains balance.
VoltaireVoltaire: "To respect the growing consensus and foster compromise, I propose we adopt Diderot's amendment as a starting point, then vote on Condorcet's 10-point increase as an optional adjustment, as suggested by Sartre."
DiderotDiderot: To respect the growing consensus and foster compromise, I second Voltaire's proposal to adopt my amendment as a starting point, then vote on Condorcet's 10-point increase as an optional adjustment.
CondorcetCondorcet: I appreciate the consensus around an 18-turn interval, but to maintain fairness and predictability, I must insist on keeping the 10-point increase. I propose we vote on Diderot's amendment first, then discuss Condorcet's 10-point increase as an optional adjustment.
SartreSartre: I appreciate Condorcet's commitment to consistency, but to encourage adaptability and strategic planning, I propose we adopt Diderot's amendment as a starting point, then vote on Condorcet's 10-point increase as an optional adjustment, as suggested by Voltaire. This respects the majority's preference and fosters compromise while allowing for flexibility.
The division
MontaignenayTo maintain balance and encourage strategic planning, I prefer an 18-turn interval.
VoltaireayeTo respect Condorcet's commitment to consistency and predictability.
DiderotnayTo maintain balance and respect the growing consensus on an 18-turn interval.
CondorcetnayPrefer consistency at 18 turns
SartrenayTo encourage gradual progression and longevity, I support Diderot's proposal.
rejected 1 aye · 4 nay
Rule 206 requires the proposer to lose 10 points on a defeated proposal.
Turn 33Diderotcarried
moves to amend §302After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game increases by 11 points.
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Diderot's proposal, but to encourage adaptability and strategic planning, I propose we vote on Condorcet's amendment first, which introduces a 17-turn interval with a 10-point increase.
VoltaireVoltaire: In the spirit of compromise, I propose we first vote on Diderot's amendment, then discuss and vote on Condorcet's amendment subsequently.
DiderotDiderot: I appreciate Montaigne's and Voltaire's input. To maintain consistency and balance, let's first vote on my amendment, then consider Condorcet's proposal, ensuring we have a firm base before exploring further changes.
CondorcetCondorcet: I support Diderot's proposal, but to encourage adaptability, I also propose we consider an amendment to rule 302 with a 17-turn interval and a 10-point increase.
SartreSartre: I appreciate the current proposals, but to promote fairness and adaptability, I suggest we first vote on Diderot's amendment, then consider Condorcet's amendment alongside a proposal of mine: introducing a simultaneous voting system for rule changes.
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Sartre's innovative idea, but to maintain predictability and stability, let's first solidify the target score increase interval, then consider simultaneous voting as a separate proposal.
VoltaireVoltaire: To respect the growing consensus and maintain fairness, I propose we adopt Diderot's amendment first, then discuss and vote on Condorcet's amendment to complement it, rather than replacing it.
DiderotDiderot: Given the consensus around an 18-turn interval, I propose we vote on my amendment first, then discuss Condorcet's and Sartre's proposals separately to maintain clarity and focus.
CondorcetCondorcet: To maintain consistency and allow for strategic planning, I propose we follow Diderot's suggestion and first vote on his amendment, then discuss and vote on my amendment subsequently.
SartreSartre: To foster compromise and adaptability, let's vote on Diderot's amendment first, then discuss Condorcet's and my simultaneous voting proposal as complementary additions.
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: To respect Diderot's and Condorcet's proposals, let's first vote on Diderot's amendment, then discuss and vote on Condorcet's amendment separately.
VoltaireVoltaire: "To respect the growing consensus and maintain fairness, I propose we adopt Diderot's amendment first, then discuss Condorcet's amendment to complement it, rather than replacing it."
DiderotDiderot: In the interest of maintaining balance and fairness, let's first vote on my amendment, then discuss Condorcet's and Sartre's proposals separately to ensure clarity and focus.
CondorcetCondorcet: I concur with Diderot's proposal to vote on his amendment first, then discuss Condorcet's and Sartre's proposals separately.
SartreSartre: To foster compromise and adaptability, let's vote on Diderot's amendment first, then discuss Condorcet's and my simultaneous voting proposal as complementary additions.
The division
MontaigneayeMaintains consistency and balance.
VoltaireayeTo maintain balance and fairness.
DiderotayeTo maintain balance and consistency.
CondorcetayeTo maintain balance and fairness.
SartreayeTo maintain balance and consistency.
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
game-master verdict discarded (verdict op 'amend' targets a rule number not in the ruleset: 302); the proposal's own targets were also unusable, nothing applied
Turn 32Voltairecarried
moves to amend §302After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 12 points.
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Voltaire's latest proposal. To maintain a balance between adaptability and predictability, I propose we settle on a 11-point increase after every 18 turns. This amendment allows for strategic planning while keeping the game dynamic.
VoltaireVoltaire: "I understand Montaigne's concern for balance, but a 12-point increase after every 18 turns would make the game more challenging and exciting, encouraging strategic play while still allowing for predictability."
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the increased challenge, I must insist on maintaining the 18-turn interval with a consistent 11-point increase to preserve fairness and consistency.
CondorcetCondorcet: To maintain fairness and avoid sudden shifts in difficulty, I propose we keep the 18-turn interval with an 11-point increase, as Diderot suggests.
SartreSartre: I appreciate the discussion, but to encourage adaptability and prevent staleness, I propose we introduce a random factor: "After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by a random number between 10 and 14 points."
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Sartre's innovative suggestion, but to maintain predictability and stability, I propose a compromise: "After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 11 or 12 points, chosen at random." This way, we encourage adaptability without sacrificing too much predictability.
VoltaireVoltaire: "I appreciate Montaigne's latest compromise. To balance predictability and adaptability, I propose we adopt his suggestion, 'After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 11 or 12 points, chosen at random'."
DiderotDiderot: To maintain fairness and consistency, I propose we settle on a fixed increase of 11 points after every 18 turns, as previously agreed.
CondorcetCondorcet: To maintain fairness and stability, I second Diderot's proposal for a consistent 11-point increase every 18 turns.
SartreSartre: While I understand the desire for consistency, I propose we combine Diderot's 11-point increase with Voltaire's random factor, creating a new rule: "After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by a random number between 10 and 12 points." This maintains fairness while introducing a subtle element of unpredictability.
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate the nuances in Voltaire's proposal, but to maintain balance and consistency, I propose we vote on Diderot's amendment first, then discuss Sartre's.
VoltaireVoltaire: "To balance the interests of all players and respect the collective effort, I propose we compromise at an 11-point increase after every 18 turns, as Diderot suggests, with a vote on Sartre's random factor amendment to follow."
DiderotDiderot: I appreciate the compromise reached, but to ensure consistency and allow for strategic planning, I propose we first vote on my amend to maintain the 18-turn interval with a consistent 11-point increase.
CondorcetCondorcet: I support Diderot's proposal for consistency and fairness. Let's vote on his amendment first, then discuss Sartre's random factor idea.
SartreSartre: To balance the collective effort and adaptability, I propose a vote first on Diderot's amendment, followed by a vote on my amendment to introduce a subtle random factor, as previously suggested.
The division
MontaigneayeTo foster consensus and respect the collective effort
VoltaireayeTo foster consensus and respect the collective effort.
DiderotayeTo encourage strategic play and maintain excitement.
CondorcetayeTo respect the majority's preference and maintain balance.
SartreayeRespecting the growing consensus and maintaining fairness.
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
game-master verdict discarded (verdict op 'amend' targets a rule number not in the ruleset: 302); the proposal's own targets were also unusable, nothing applied
Turn 31Montaignecarried
moves to amend §302After every 18 turns, the target score for winning the game is increased by 11 points.
Discussion · round 1
MontaigneI appreciate the consistency that rule 302 has achieved, but to maintain a challenge and prevent stagnation, I propose we increase the interval to 20 turns, as initially suggested by Diderot. This would provide a more gradual progression in the target score and allow for more strategic play.
VoltaireVoltaire: In the spirit of compromise and to respect the consistency achieved, I propose we adopt Montaigne's amendment, increasing the interval to 20 turns. To balance this, let's keep the target score increase at 11 points to maintain a steady progression.
DiderotDiderot: While I appreciate the compromise, I must insist on maintaining the 18-turn interval as it promotes a consistent and fair progression for all players.
CondorcetCondorcet: To maintain fairness and consistency, I support Diderot's proposal for an 18-turn interval, but I propose we increase the target score by 12 points instead of 11 for a more significant progression.
SartreSartre: I appreciate the nuances in each proposal, but to encourage adaptability and prevent stagnation, let's vote on Condorcet's 18-turn, 12-point increase as a complementary addition to Diderot's amendment.
Discussion · round 2
MontaigneMontaigne: I understand Diderot's preference for consistency, but increasing the interval to 20 turns allows for more dynamic strategy. To compromise, I propose we settle on a 19-turn interval, maintaining an 11-point increase as suggested by Voltaire.
VoltaireVoltaire: In the interest of consensus and respecting the collective effort, I propose we adopt Montaigne's compromise of a 19-turn interval with an 11-point increase.
DiderotDiderot: "While I appreciate the compromise of a 19-turn interval, I must insist on maintaining the 11-point increase to preserve a steady progression."
CondorcetCondorcet: To find a balanced solution that respects the majority's preference for an 18-turn interval, I propose we increase the target score by 11 points, as previously agreed.
SartreSartre: I propose we vote on Voltaire's amendment first, then discuss Condorcet's additional increase. This respects the majority's preference and allows for further refinement.
Discussion · round 3
MontaigneMontaigne: I appreciate Diderot's steadfastness in maintaining the 11-point increase. To honor this and find a middle ground, I propose we return to the previous consensus of an 18-turn interval, with an increase of 11 points. This respects consistency while allowing for strategic play.
VoltaireVoltaire: "To respect the growing consensus and maintain fairness, I propose we adopt Montaigne's latest suggestion of an 18-turn interval with an 11-point increase."
DiderotDiderot: To maintain balance and fairness, I propose we settle on an 18-turn interval with a 12-point increase, as suggested by Condorcet earlier.
CondorcetCondorcet: To respect the majority's preference and maintain fairness, I propose we adopt Voltaire's amendment of an 18-turn interval with an 11-point increase, as it balances adaptability and consistency.
SartreSartre: I appreciate the progress made towards a consensus. To ensure adaptability, let's vote on Diderot's proposal first, then discuss Condorcet's additional increase if necessary.
The division
MontaigneayeRespecting the growing consensus and maintaining fairness.
VoltaireayeRespects consistency while allowing for strategic play
DiderotayeRespects consistency and maintains a steady progression.
CondorcetayeRespecting the majority's preference and maintaining fairness.
SartreayeRespects the current consensus and encourages strategic play.
carried 5 aye · 0 nay
game-master verdict discarded (verdict op 'amend' targets a rule number not in the ruleset: 302); the proposal's own targets were also unusable, nothing applied
Verify this game
- Seed
748083566- Verify it yourself
python scripts/audit_game.py games/051/events.json- Audit result
- 4 finding(s) disclosed below
- [seq=751, turn=25] procedure_consistency: the GM's voting_rule reading changed from {'type': 'fraction', 'value': 0.5, 'abstain_blocks': False, 'label': 'simple majority after two full circuits of players (§203)', 'authority': 203} to {'type': 'unanimous', 'value': 1.0, 'abstain_blocks': False, 'label': 'unanimous consent until two full circuits, then simple majority (§203)', 'authority': 203} with no rule_changed event in between — legitimate only if a rule conditions procedure on the turn number; verify the cited rule
- [seq=781, turn=26] procedure_consistency: the GM's voting_rule reading changed from {'type': 'unanimous', 'value': 1.0, 'abstain_blocks': False, 'label': 'unanimous consent until two full circuits, then simple majority (§203)', 'authority': 203} to {'type': 'fraction', 'value': 0.5, 'abstain_blocks': False, 'label': 'simple majority after two full circuits, unanimous consent before (§203)', 'authority': 203} with no rule_changed event in between — legitimate only if a rule conditions procedure on the turn number; verify the cited rule
- [seq=811, turn=27] procedure_consistency: the GM's voting_rule reading changed from {'type': 'fraction', 'value': 0.5, 'abstain_blocks': False, 'label': 'simple majority after two full circuits, unanimous consent before (§203)', 'authority': 203} to {'type': 'unanimous', 'value': 1.0, 'abstain_blocks': False, 'label': 'unanimous consent before two full circuits, simple majority after (§203)', 'authority': 203} with no rule_changed event in between — legitimate only if a rule conditions procedure on the turn number; verify the cited rule
- [seq=931, turn=31] procedure_consistency: the GM's voting_rule reading changed from {'type': 'unanimous', 'value': 1.0, 'abstain_blocks': False, 'label': 'unanimous consent before two full circuits, simple majority after (§203)', 'authority': 203} to {'type': 'fraction', 'value': 0.5, 'abstain_blocks': False, 'label': 'simple majority after two full circuits', 'authority': 203} with no rule_changed event in between — legitimate only if a rule conditions procedure on the turn number; verify the cited rule